Soccernomics: Why England Loses, Why Germany and Brazil Win, and Why the U.S., Japan, Australia, Turkey--and Even Iraq--Are Destined to Become the Kings of the Worlds Most Popular Sport (英語) ペーパーバック – 2009/10/27
Kindle 端末は必要ありません。無料 Kindle アプリのいずれかをダウンロードすると、スマートフォン、タブレットPCで Kindle 本をお読みいただけます。
These are questions every soccer aficionado has asked. Soccernomics answers them.
Using insights and analogies from economics, statistics, psychology, and business to cast a new and entertaining light on how the game works, Soccernomics reveals the often surprisingly counterintuitive truths about soccer. An essential guide for the 2010 World Cup, Soccernomics is a new way of looking at the world's most popular game.
"If you're a football fan, I'll save you some time: read this book ... compulsive reading ... thoroughly convincing."
"Szymanksi has recently published the best introduction to sports economics ... while Kuper is probably the smartest of the new generation of super-smart sportswriters ... fascinating stories."
"[Kuper and Szymanski] basically trash every cliché about football you ever held to be true. It's bravura stuff … the study of managers buying players and building a club is one you’ll feel like photocopying and sending to your team's chairman"
Paddy Harverson, former communications director of Manchester United, Financial Times
"Demolishes ... many soccer shibboleths ... well argued, too. Szymanski, an economist, knows his stuff, and Kuper, a born contrarian and FT sports writer, is incapable of cliché ... great stories and previously unknown nuggets."
"One for the thinkers"
That being said, I really enjoyed this book taken at face value: a different way of looking at the game of soccer. You don't need to have an extensive background in the game to pick up this book (I am a burgeoning American soccer fan, go ahead and hate away), but you'll enjoy it if you've been a fan for life as well. Soccernomics throws out all of the usual stereotypes and truths and takes a look at what is really going on in soccer, whether player and coaching dynamics, World Cup economics, the fairness of the penalty kick, what countries succeed at sports and why, and more.
If you're a fan of soccer and/or simply enjoy game theory and understanding something deeper about the game, you'll find a lot here for you. I read it last summer and it greatly enhanced my World Cup experience and has further enhanced my following the US team, the Premier League, and more this year. I consistently find myself watching a game or reading an article and something from Soccernomics pops into my head to ponder. Pick it up and give it a shot, and just let the book be what it is, and you'll enjoy it.
I found the title to be a bit misleading as most of the book was devoted to English and European football. The question posed "why the U.S, Japan, Australia, Turkey and even Iraq are destined to become the kings" received only a token section comparatively and didn't give any insights into why these countries will be more dominant other than on economic grounds.
However as an Australian fan where the premier league has always been shown extensively(more so than the local leagues) it is understandable that this league and European football as a whole was used due to its more reliable statistics.
Most of the statistics and facts were well verified and were explained in a rational way without emotional bias. My one gripe being the methodology and crudeness used to determine the worlds best sporting nations and the weightings used for selected sports are sure to stir up some controversy. For instance Karate and Chess are rated as world sports given equal ratings to the likes of basketball, tennis and cricket. Without doubt as expected the U.S.A was rated the overall sporting champion in my opinion the lead should have been more considering NFL was not used, and its large numbers of competitors in most major sports.
However the best nation on a per capita rating was shown tob clearly a certain scandinavian nation based solely on its performance in winter olympics (given too high a rating for an elitist sport) and womens soccer without any remote contribution from any other major sport. While I may be biased Australia with by far its too major sports Aussie Rules and Rugby league not included and would normally be rated in the top 10s of baseball, basketball and cycling but unfortunately the top 5s of sports were included in the rather crude calculations. Australia does remarkably well in soccer considering at best its the fifth most popular sport in the country. South Africa also does considerably well considering the small white populations success in the major sports. Perhaps climate could have been considered or maybe one for another book.
Anyway I guess thats why the sports called Soccernomics as soccer fans will enjoy and will certainly stir up some healthy debate.
The authors even stated that the data they found was not reliable and often lacking, yet did they still use it? I don't even know. Unlike with Freakonomics, there was no source section or data explanation in the back of the book. The only thing that was included was a selected bibliography.
Overall, I agree with the main argument of the book: that as soccer (like most industries) becomes more globalized, new non-European/Brazilian leaders will emerge. However, I would take most of the other arguments with a grain of salt.