Update February, 2017. Still basically No S-ing. Seven years. I have adjusted some things, but I don't think I could have done that much earlier. It's mostly in response to a reduced appetite as I age.
Update Jan, 14, 2013. I've now been No S-ing for three years. I lost another 7% of my original weight over this last year, for a total of 18% down. I am fitting into a size of pants I haven't been able to wear for more than 15 years. This is with no regular exercise (maybe this year!), still slipping at times, and after menopause. I still can't imagine having stuck to anything else this long. My appetite has continued to diminish. It's surprising how small my meals can be and still be enough. This is now my normal way of eating.
Update Dec. 20, 2011 I wanted to update this review because of the reality of most dieting efforts: 97% of those who reach goal gain most, all, or even more weight back; of those who do not right away, only 25% have kept the weight off after 5 years. I'm here after committing to at least a year of No S on Jan. 1 of 2010. After a year, I had no desire to ever return to traditional dieting. Thus it is nearly two years later. Is it bad news that I have not reached a low weight? It will be to some, but the wise will see that being able to sustain an 11% weight loss with no consistent added exercise and only 85% compliance is a real-life victory. (Did you know that a 5-10% sustained loss that leaves most obese patients still obese is considered great success in the anti-obesity medical industry? It's true. Check google scholar, not the average websites.) People tell me I look good and are surprised that I'm still a bit overweight by BMI standards. I'm happy to report that though there have been ups and downs, they have been much milder than anything in my previous 40 years of attempts at weight loss, and it's getting easier all the time! I rarely crave junk, I actually prefer savory meals over sweet desserts most of the time, and I love getting hungry! I do not fear food! I also feel I look better than I thought I did in my 20's, though I'm heavier now. Maybe that's a function of age and resignation, but it really feels a lot more like the result of hundreds of delicious meals savored and hundreds of sufficient gaps between those meals to engender enjoyment and the realization that the greater stringency to get skinny would not likely be sustainable. I'm sure there are chemical reasons for these successes; I do look at the literature on such at times and find that much of what Reinhard suggests is backed by science; the astonishing fact is that he gleaned this without spending his time on the science, but more on 1) examining the habits of generations here and in other cultures, as well as those before us who attempted the fulfilled life and 2) using their precepts to live it himself, looking for a way to avoid the food and exercise obsessions of so many to that he could turn his attention to so much more that matters in life; his profession, his wife and children (I hope they feel his loving attention), and the great minds of civilization. At least those are the ones he is public about. He is unfailing kind to all except the purveyors of false hope, and his program is a reflection of that humous kindness. But you don't have to admire the heck out of Reinhard to get benefit from the program.
I've been on the No S boards long enough now to see many who ran from the everyday pragmatics of the program to the arms of the traditional diet industry return ready to surrender after more failure and weight gain. Like the father of the prodigal son, we rejoice and open our arms with no approbation. Come and live sanity and peace with food, the new prosperity of 21st century modern life.
If you're looking for a way to return to or experience long-term sanity with regard to food this new year, please give No S a real college try. Even if it's not perfect for you, I doubt it will do the damage most programs do, though everyone handles failure in his/her own way. Dec. 20, 2011
This is from my original review so long ago. I've actually rarely followed traditonal diet books that dictated exactly what to eat when. I learned early of the idea of de-criminalizing food and of the difference between hunger and the desire to eat. However, I still ate too much and gained weight. I couldn't find a way to be disciplined about how much and when to eat. I also spent a few years trying to follow the eat-5-to-6 times a day advice of the bodybuilder crowd, assuming that they were THE experts in fat loss, and that fat loss was the holy grail of weight loss. Trouble was, my real goal was not to get to an extremely low bodyfat-a dubious goal, in my opinion- but to learn to eat in accordance with my body's real needs AND live in the real world. In short, to make peace with food, my body, and my work/social life .
Reinhard is the first to say that even this "diet" program is a work in progress, but, for me, 55 and counting, this is the best of many worlds when it comes to trying to live peaceably with food and reach a healthy weight.
No one said that you don't need a calorie deficit to lose weight. What is said is that there are other ways to limit calories and that psychological elements combined with greater attunement with the body's true needs are what really help people make long-term changes in their eating habits. Many people who maintain their weight and have very good health profiles eat three meals a day. Naturally slim people never count calories. How is it that they maintain the same weight, often for years, without figuring out their intake and expenditures? The answer is that the body already knows! What has to be removed are the screens that cover up the body's feedback and the impetus to eat according to its needs. The fact that this has been hard to do for many overeaters doesn't mean it isn't true. It also doesn't mean you become a slave to your hunger, as many of the programs that advocate eating only when hungry and stopping before you are full make you, any more than you want to remain a slave to your impulses to overeat. Over a period of time, the "diet" is giving me a chance to learn how to balance this eating machine within the parameters of human culture, i.e., to eat reasonably and moderately and still enjoy the social and entertainment aspects of food. I thought at first that free eating on the weekends would carry over into the week, but it's been true that the five days in a row of three meals a day without a lot of restrictions besides no sweets, as well as the liberating sense that I have not failed by eating a little too much on the weekends, has really helped dull the desire to keep going on the chocolate after Sunday.
If you have real health problems that absolutely dictate that you eliminate certain foods and eat at more frequent intervals, Reinhard would be the first to tell you to listen to your doctor and do what she says! But most overweight people are not in that category. Do yourself a favor, give up the belief that some diet that recommends many restrictions to start--promoting speed at the expense of a real solution--, get this book, and commit to ending the cycle of optimistic curtailment, failure, and discouragement. It doesn't mean you will get this first try, but you when you do, you'll feel that it really will get easier and that you can do this...forever.
この商品をお持ちですか?
無料のKindleアプリをダウンロードして、スマートフォン、タブレット、またはコンピューターで今すぐKindle本を読むことができます。Kindleデバイスは必要ありません。
ウェブ版Kindleなら、お使いのブラウザですぐにお読みいただけます。
携帯電話のカメラを使用する - 以下のコードをスキャンし、Kindleアプリをダウンロードしてください。
The No S Diet: The Strikingly Simple Weight-Loss Strategy That Has Dieters Raving--and Dropping Pounds ペーパーバック – 2008/3/4
英語版
Reinhard Engels
(著),
Ben Kallen
(著)
- Kindle版 (電子書籍)
¥2,140
獲得ポイント: 21pt 今すぐお読みいただけます: 無料アプリ - ペーパーバック
¥1,629¥2,209 より 4 中古品 ¥1,629 より 6 新品 ¥5,195 より 2 コレクター商品
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"¥1,629","priceAmount":1629.00,"currencySymbol":"¥","integerValue":"1,629","decimalSeparator":null,"fractionalValue":null,"symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"qt0EEyBENETmY%2F3ahR26aK051opOWnQya08l6B83P08Cz7kH8K5IwJEjZTfD58sZKuXw8SrR%2BaVXVC3q3rKD3Yldu%2FTyTKZxouM0Bau%2FNX9v1YTaMY2ZS1QovRxhtMPIHQOS32vE7zmRaBipr4hJNvYMRxZjZocG3UavXBNOc9zGgK7VQcnwZ1LtHmtQmJod","locale":"ja-JP","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}
購入オプションとあわせ買い
No Snacks. No Sweets. No Seconds.*
*Except on days that start with S (Saturdays, Sundays, and Special days).
Developed by a problem-solving software engineer who was tired of diets that are too hard to stick with, The No-S Diet has attracted a passionate following online thanks to its elegant simplicity-and its results. Unlike fad diets based on gimmicks that lead to short-term weight-loss followed by backsliding and failure, The No-S Diet is a maintainable life plan that reminds us of the commonsense, conscious way we all know we should be eating.
The book offers readers the tips, tricks, techniques and testimonials they'll need to stick with No-S for life
*Except on days that start with S (Saturdays, Sundays, and Special days).
Developed by a problem-solving software engineer who was tired of diets that are too hard to stick with, The No-S Diet has attracted a passionate following online thanks to its elegant simplicity-and its results. Unlike fad diets based on gimmicks that lead to short-term weight-loss followed by backsliding and failure, The No-S Diet is a maintainable life plan that reminds us of the commonsense, conscious way we all know we should be eating.
The book offers readers the tips, tricks, techniques and testimonials they'll need to stick with No-S for life
- 本の長さ208ページ
- 言語英語
- 出版社TarcherPerigee
- 発売日2008/3/4
- 対象読者年齢18 歳以上
- 寸法11.76 x 1.4 x 20.22 cm
- ISBN-100399534040
- ISBN-13978-0399534041
この商品を買った人はこんな商品も買っています
ページ: 1 / 1 最初に戻るページ: 1 / 1
商品の説明
著者について
Reinhard Engels is a software engineer based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ben Kallen is a health and nutrition writer with 15 years of experience.
登録情報
- 出版社 : TarcherPerigee (2008/3/4)
- 発売日 : 2008/3/4
- 言語 : 英語
- ペーパーバック : 208ページ
- ISBN-10 : 0399534040
- ISBN-13 : 978-0399534041
- 対象読者年齢 : 18 歳以上
- 寸法 : 11.76 x 1.4 x 20.22 cm
- カスタマーレビュー:
著者について
著者をフォローして、新作のアップデートや改善されたおすすめを入手してください。

著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう

著者の本をもっと発見したり、よく似た著者を見つけたり、著者のブログを読んだりしましょう
カスタマーレビュー
5つ星のうち4.6
4.6/5
238 件のグローバル評価
評価はどのように計算されますか?
全体的な星の評価と星ごとの割合の内訳を計算するために、単純な平均は使用されません。その代わり、レビューの日時がどれだけ新しいかや、レビューアーがAmazonで商品を購入したかどうかなどが考慮されます。また、レビューを分析して信頼性が検証されます。
他の国からのトップレビュー
oolala53
5つ星のうち5.0
aren't you looking for a "forever" kind of solution?
2008年11月11日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Blue Morpho
5つ星のうち5.0
Simple way to control overeating
2011年2月22日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
The reviewer who said that everything in the book is on the front cover is basically right -- the diet can be summarized in 13-14 words, which are on the cover of the book. And furthermore just about all the content is on the website [...]. The author points as much out himself. (He'd probably like for you to buy his book, but you can also go to his website and click on the Amazon link to buy something else, like a really good cookbook for your favorite cuisine.) I bought the Kindle edition because I did find it handy to have the explanations and advice all in one place so that I could look at them any time, but I'd already been following the diet for a month at that point.
The great thing about the No-S diet is that the idea IS simple -- yet it works. He could have called it the "No Duh Diet." I'm probably a fairly typical 50-year-old adult who was more active and had less exposure to snack food when I was younger but who has found my weight slowly creeping up over the years. Sure I could lose a few pounds with a concerted effort, but they'd come right back when I stopped trying so hard. By following this simple advice I've been losing close to a pound a week and (after the first week) really haven't had to think too much about it. Even on weekends when I'm technically free to eat as I please, I've found that the No-S habits have helped me to avoid overeating when I probably would have otherwise. I seldom take seconds at weekend meals now. I do have dessert and occasional snacks on the weekend, but it's easier to limit these as well to what I really want and will enjoy.
With this diet -- really I don't consider it a diet so much as a change of eating habits -- you follow a few strict rules 5 days a week. You eat no snacks between meals and no sweets for dessert. Three times a day you fill a plate with enough food to get you to your next meal and then enjoy eating it -- no seconds. These 5 days are enough to retrain your pattern of appetite and eating so that even on weekends and other special days when you're not so strict, you don't lose control and are still aware of what you're eating. This retraining of habit is the heart of the diet. You learn that you don't really need to stoke every slight pang of "hunger" the moment you feel it and that if you eat enough sustaining food at meals and drink a reasonable amount of fluid in between, you won't be getting so many pangs anyway. On the other hand, there's no food that you can't eat and enjoy at the right time and in a reasonable amount.
One of the first things I learned on the No-S diet was just how much I had been snacking during the day. I'd catch myself reaching for something over and over at first. The author cites a study on his website that found that 110 percent of the 16 percent increase in calories calories consumed by women in a recent year compared to 1970 were consumed outside meals (for men it was 90 % of the excess -- I think men are bigger at going back for seconds); in other words we eat less at meals but snack WAY more. I'd read in the past that NOT snacking was one of the habits associated with longevity, and I'd always thought this odd since so many sources actually advise snacking as a good thing. But the truth is that it's just very hard to snack and not overeat because so much snacking is mindless. Ten tortilla chips - 100 calories, an apple -100 calories, a spoonful of peanut butter - 100 calories. It adds up fast. At the end of a year, hundred extra calories a day is stored as ten extra pounds of fat!
A nice thing about this diet is that it's quite adaptable to a variety of cuisines and special diets -- you can follow it and keep Kosher or vegetarian, you can eat French food or Chinese food. There are people who follow it and do low carb or low fat diets, though the author doesn't himself advise either of these. You can also adapt the rules if they don't quite work for you (as long as you're strict about you adaptations and not overly hard on yourself), and you can decide how you want to handle S days and which days you call "special." (My rule for non-weekend birthdays for instance is that I eat like a normal day EXCEPT for one plate or bowl of dessert, such as birthday cake and ice cream. So if I go to a kid's party and the chips and sodas are everywhere, I just say I'm saving up for the birthday cake -- and I enjoy it when it's time. If there's pizza and it's mealtime, I have a slice or two, whatever fits on a plate, hopefully with some veggies, and call it a meal. Obviously most meals aren't like that, but I don't have to choose between my diet and being part of the party. If I don't lose weight that day, no big deal -- most likely I'm not gaining either. The first week on the diet my 14 year old son, who usually moans about toasting himself a bagel, went on the internet and found a recipe for Alfredo sauce and decided on a whim that he was going to make it for the family dinner. If I had been on any other diet -- low carb or low fat -- that would have been difficult for me to manage. As it was, I helped my son find the ingredients he needed, cooked the pasta, suggested adding a bit of ham that we had, and sauteed some baby Portabellas we had for my husband and me to add to the sauce. I had a moderate portion of the pasta on a plate with some salad, told my son his sauce was great, felt fine about it (a successful day on the No-S diet), and still lost a pound that week.
So who would this diet not be good for? I think someone who has a lot of food issues or a true eating disorder might not find it helpful. The diet is pretty straightforward and no-nonsense, but it's certainly possible to sabotage it (say by loading up huge plates and meals and bingeing on weekends) or to add so many personal rules that the simplicity of the idea is undermined. And certainly a person with a metabolic disease such as diabetes would need to work out with a doctor whether this would be suitable and also whether the S-days would be problematic, since day to day consistency could be an issue.
But for someone who just needs a simple way to control overeating and maybe lose weight while still being able to enjoy a variety of good foods without a lot of stress or guilt, it's an extremely useful tool.
The great thing about the No-S diet is that the idea IS simple -- yet it works. He could have called it the "No Duh Diet." I'm probably a fairly typical 50-year-old adult who was more active and had less exposure to snack food when I was younger but who has found my weight slowly creeping up over the years. Sure I could lose a few pounds with a concerted effort, but they'd come right back when I stopped trying so hard. By following this simple advice I've been losing close to a pound a week and (after the first week) really haven't had to think too much about it. Even on weekends when I'm technically free to eat as I please, I've found that the No-S habits have helped me to avoid overeating when I probably would have otherwise. I seldom take seconds at weekend meals now. I do have dessert and occasional snacks on the weekend, but it's easier to limit these as well to what I really want and will enjoy.
With this diet -- really I don't consider it a diet so much as a change of eating habits -- you follow a few strict rules 5 days a week. You eat no snacks between meals and no sweets for dessert. Three times a day you fill a plate with enough food to get you to your next meal and then enjoy eating it -- no seconds. These 5 days are enough to retrain your pattern of appetite and eating so that even on weekends and other special days when you're not so strict, you don't lose control and are still aware of what you're eating. This retraining of habit is the heart of the diet. You learn that you don't really need to stoke every slight pang of "hunger" the moment you feel it and that if you eat enough sustaining food at meals and drink a reasonable amount of fluid in between, you won't be getting so many pangs anyway. On the other hand, there's no food that you can't eat and enjoy at the right time and in a reasonable amount.
One of the first things I learned on the No-S diet was just how much I had been snacking during the day. I'd catch myself reaching for something over and over at first. The author cites a study on his website that found that 110 percent of the 16 percent increase in calories calories consumed by women in a recent year compared to 1970 were consumed outside meals (for men it was 90 % of the excess -- I think men are bigger at going back for seconds); in other words we eat less at meals but snack WAY more. I'd read in the past that NOT snacking was one of the habits associated with longevity, and I'd always thought this odd since so many sources actually advise snacking as a good thing. But the truth is that it's just very hard to snack and not overeat because so much snacking is mindless. Ten tortilla chips - 100 calories, an apple -100 calories, a spoonful of peanut butter - 100 calories. It adds up fast. At the end of a year, hundred extra calories a day is stored as ten extra pounds of fat!
A nice thing about this diet is that it's quite adaptable to a variety of cuisines and special diets -- you can follow it and keep Kosher or vegetarian, you can eat French food or Chinese food. There are people who follow it and do low carb or low fat diets, though the author doesn't himself advise either of these. You can also adapt the rules if they don't quite work for you (as long as you're strict about you adaptations and not overly hard on yourself), and you can decide how you want to handle S days and which days you call "special." (My rule for non-weekend birthdays for instance is that I eat like a normal day EXCEPT for one plate or bowl of dessert, such as birthday cake and ice cream. So if I go to a kid's party and the chips and sodas are everywhere, I just say I'm saving up for the birthday cake -- and I enjoy it when it's time. If there's pizza and it's mealtime, I have a slice or two, whatever fits on a plate, hopefully with some veggies, and call it a meal. Obviously most meals aren't like that, but I don't have to choose between my diet and being part of the party. If I don't lose weight that day, no big deal -- most likely I'm not gaining either. The first week on the diet my 14 year old son, who usually moans about toasting himself a bagel, went on the internet and found a recipe for Alfredo sauce and decided on a whim that he was going to make it for the family dinner. If I had been on any other diet -- low carb or low fat -- that would have been difficult for me to manage. As it was, I helped my son find the ingredients he needed, cooked the pasta, suggested adding a bit of ham that we had, and sauteed some baby Portabellas we had for my husband and me to add to the sauce. I had a moderate portion of the pasta on a plate with some salad, told my son his sauce was great, felt fine about it (a successful day on the No-S diet), and still lost a pound that week.
So who would this diet not be good for? I think someone who has a lot of food issues or a true eating disorder might not find it helpful. The diet is pretty straightforward and no-nonsense, but it's certainly possible to sabotage it (say by loading up huge plates and meals and bingeing on weekends) or to add so many personal rules that the simplicity of the idea is undermined. And certainly a person with a metabolic disease such as diabetes would need to work out with a doctor whether this would be suitable and also whether the S-days would be problematic, since day to day consistency could be an issue.
But for someone who just needs a simple way to control overeating and maybe lose weight while still being able to enjoy a variety of good foods without a lot of stress or guilt, it's an extremely useful tool.
AJC.
5つ星のうち5.0
Fantastic book. Worth buying, despite it being a simple concept.
2014年2月1日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
I've just finished reading the No S Diet. I purchased the Kindle copy.
I thought the book was incredibly good and if I could I would give it 6 stars. I purchased not because I needed it but because I read the website at nosdiet [dot] com and thought it was excellent. I wanted to learn more.
There is an awful lot of misleading BS out there on the internet and some of these diets are at worst, money making schemes that won't work long term, and at best, overly complex and you end up getting bogged down in minutiae.
A little under 18 months ago I was a little overweight and successfully lost 20 pounds in 13 weeks and got back to being lean. I did that using an approach very similar to the No S Diet. It didn't have a name but it worked brilliantly well, for the same reasons that No S works.
The No S Diet is some of the must sane, sensible, down to earth and above all REALISTIC advice on losing weight that you will ever get. It's absolutely right when it says that there are no evil foods, just portions that are too big, or consumption patterns that are too regular. The world of dieting these days outright neglects the basics, the only things that matter in favour of pseudo science in an effort to appear unique new and funky.
I'm doubtful about the negative reviews on Amazon.com. Yes, reading the website alone will probably give you all of the information you need to go away and start implementing this diet and losing some weight, but you'll be missing out. Did these people actually read the book? I don't think so. It has 7 chapters. The first is an introduction and then chapters 2, 3 and 4 detail each of the principles in turn no snacks, no sweets, no seconds.
The real value in this book for the repeat dieter who has at one time tried everything under the sun but still can't lose weight are chapters 5, 6 and 7. Those chapters answer some important questions but above all deal with the most important side of dieting. The mental side. The psychological side. The emotional side. The intangible side.
The chapter on forming habits and being strict was worth the price of the book alone. It highlights the reasons that some people will fail on this diet and gives you concrete tips to overcome those hurdles.
People get fat because they ingest too many calories during waking hours. It's that simple. The only reason you can't buy that is because numerous other diet systems have warped your mind and convinced you otherwise, leading you believe that there are other more sinister, covert factors at work, like the glycemic index etc. There aren't. We're not talking about health, nutrition, or complex medical conditions here. When dealing with weight loss, it's calories that matter, nothing else. This book acknowledges that and then gives you a system to make it psychologically easier to stay on the straight and narrow for the long term. Dieting is almost entirely mental. The physical side of dieting is child's play.
This diet will give you a method of reducing your calorie intake without torturing yourself, and one that you will find gets easier and easier. Here is how it works.
Weekdays (Also known as Non “S” Days or “N” Days)
No Snacks
You have 3 meals a day just like people did for hundreds of years. You eat breakfast, lunch and dinner. You eat NOTHING in between those meals. It doesn't matter whether it's healthy, unhealthy, big portion, tiny portion. You eat only breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Why? - Because most of the excess calories consumed in the Western world are not consumed at meal times. They are consumed BETWEEN meals. If you piled up all the between-meal eating from your entire week on the kitchen table and looked at it together as one mass, you'd be horrified at what you eat. Because you would see it all in one place. This is why some diets and personal trainers get you to keep a food diary of everything you eat, because even seeing it in writing will shock you. But because instead all this slips past your watchful eyes is tiny amounts (and not so tiny amounts) here and there, you don't see it as a problem. This is snacking and it's habitual. The No Snacks rule kills this dead.
No Sweets
You don't eat anything that has sugar as the primary ingredient. No distinction is made between refined sugar, natural sugar, fake sugar, artificial sweetners, brown sugar, white sugar, cane sugar, caster sugar. It's all sugar. Yes you can still have sugar in your tea and coffee! Things like crumbles, pastries, pies, chocolate, cakes, biscuits, ice cream etc. They all have to go. How do you know which food fall into this category? Your tastebuds will tell you. Fruit is fine as is yogurt. But if you would potentially eat it as a dessert (you know the kind I mean!), then it's not allowed.
Why? - Sugar in it's various forms contributes the most nutritionless (is that even a word?) calories to our diets. Cut it out and you will start losing weight.
No Seconds
When you eat one of your 3 allotted meals described under “No Snacks”, you don't have second helpings. Your meal should fit comfortably on to one standard sized dinner plate with NO vertical stacking allowed. If you think your getting away with stacking a garlic baguette on top of your lasagne or you can stick one pizza on top of another, think again. You eat one plate (portion), and then you're done. There are no second, thirds or fourth. There are no starters desserts or puddings. Let me spell it out for you. One plate, one portion, one helping, one course. Simple. Yes initially your portions will be massive in order to get you through to your next meal, but that's ok because you're habit building.
Why? - What matters more than anything, isn't what you eat (it does to some degree!), but how much you eat. Portion control is the name of the game here. Limiting yourself to one plate, three times a day will reduce your calorie intake, but it's a simple and easy system to remember that doesn't require any maths or brainpower.
Weekends
“S” Days
These are days that begin with the letter S. That means Saturday, Sunday and Special Days. Special days are religious or national holidays or your birthday, or the birthdays of close friends and relatives. On S days the 3 rules of No Snacks, No Sweets, No Seconds are abolished and you can eat what you want, when you want. If you're having more than two non-weekend S days in a month, you're overdoing it.
This diet will not make you lose 7 pounds in a week, but it will give you long term progress. As the author says, don't focus on results, focus on behaviours and building the habits. Results will follow. You're not in this to get slim within a week or even a month. You're in this for the rest of your life, so chillout and take it slow.
Note that the diet does not offer recipes and does not tell you what you can and can't eat, it tells you WHEN to eat and HOW MUCH to eat. The treats that you save for the weekend are used as rewards, as something you savour and eat to enjoy. Knowing that you can have something sweet, sticky and wicked at the weekend is more likely to make you stick to the 3 rules during the week. Focus on getting the “N” Days as perfect as you possibly can all the time, and then look forward to relaxing at weekends.
The only weak area of the book is it's lack of guidance on alcohol consumption. The author doesn't drink more than 2 drinks a day. I would suggest if you're having 2 drinks a day, every day without fail then you still have a problem. Try 2 drinks a day on your S days and you'll be fine.
I thought the book was incredibly good and if I could I would give it 6 stars. I purchased not because I needed it but because I read the website at nosdiet [dot] com and thought it was excellent. I wanted to learn more.
There is an awful lot of misleading BS out there on the internet and some of these diets are at worst, money making schemes that won't work long term, and at best, overly complex and you end up getting bogged down in minutiae.
A little under 18 months ago I was a little overweight and successfully lost 20 pounds in 13 weeks and got back to being lean. I did that using an approach very similar to the No S Diet. It didn't have a name but it worked brilliantly well, for the same reasons that No S works.
The No S Diet is some of the must sane, sensible, down to earth and above all REALISTIC advice on losing weight that you will ever get. It's absolutely right when it says that there are no evil foods, just portions that are too big, or consumption patterns that are too regular. The world of dieting these days outright neglects the basics, the only things that matter in favour of pseudo science in an effort to appear unique new and funky.
I'm doubtful about the negative reviews on Amazon.com. Yes, reading the website alone will probably give you all of the information you need to go away and start implementing this diet and losing some weight, but you'll be missing out. Did these people actually read the book? I don't think so. It has 7 chapters. The first is an introduction and then chapters 2, 3 and 4 detail each of the principles in turn no snacks, no sweets, no seconds.
The real value in this book for the repeat dieter who has at one time tried everything under the sun but still can't lose weight are chapters 5, 6 and 7. Those chapters answer some important questions but above all deal with the most important side of dieting. The mental side. The psychological side. The emotional side. The intangible side.
The chapter on forming habits and being strict was worth the price of the book alone. It highlights the reasons that some people will fail on this diet and gives you concrete tips to overcome those hurdles.
People get fat because they ingest too many calories during waking hours. It's that simple. The only reason you can't buy that is because numerous other diet systems have warped your mind and convinced you otherwise, leading you believe that there are other more sinister, covert factors at work, like the glycemic index etc. There aren't. We're not talking about health, nutrition, or complex medical conditions here. When dealing with weight loss, it's calories that matter, nothing else. This book acknowledges that and then gives you a system to make it psychologically easier to stay on the straight and narrow for the long term. Dieting is almost entirely mental. The physical side of dieting is child's play.
This diet will give you a method of reducing your calorie intake without torturing yourself, and one that you will find gets easier and easier. Here is how it works.
Weekdays (Also known as Non “S” Days or “N” Days)
No Snacks
You have 3 meals a day just like people did for hundreds of years. You eat breakfast, lunch and dinner. You eat NOTHING in between those meals. It doesn't matter whether it's healthy, unhealthy, big portion, tiny portion. You eat only breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Why? - Because most of the excess calories consumed in the Western world are not consumed at meal times. They are consumed BETWEEN meals. If you piled up all the between-meal eating from your entire week on the kitchen table and looked at it together as one mass, you'd be horrified at what you eat. Because you would see it all in one place. This is why some diets and personal trainers get you to keep a food diary of everything you eat, because even seeing it in writing will shock you. But because instead all this slips past your watchful eyes is tiny amounts (and not so tiny amounts) here and there, you don't see it as a problem. This is snacking and it's habitual. The No Snacks rule kills this dead.
No Sweets
You don't eat anything that has sugar as the primary ingredient. No distinction is made between refined sugar, natural sugar, fake sugar, artificial sweetners, brown sugar, white sugar, cane sugar, caster sugar. It's all sugar. Yes you can still have sugar in your tea and coffee! Things like crumbles, pastries, pies, chocolate, cakes, biscuits, ice cream etc. They all have to go. How do you know which food fall into this category? Your tastebuds will tell you. Fruit is fine as is yogurt. But if you would potentially eat it as a dessert (you know the kind I mean!), then it's not allowed.
Why? - Sugar in it's various forms contributes the most nutritionless (is that even a word?) calories to our diets. Cut it out and you will start losing weight.
No Seconds
When you eat one of your 3 allotted meals described under “No Snacks”, you don't have second helpings. Your meal should fit comfortably on to one standard sized dinner plate with NO vertical stacking allowed. If you think your getting away with stacking a garlic baguette on top of your lasagne or you can stick one pizza on top of another, think again. You eat one plate (portion), and then you're done. There are no second, thirds or fourth. There are no starters desserts or puddings. Let me spell it out for you. One plate, one portion, one helping, one course. Simple. Yes initially your portions will be massive in order to get you through to your next meal, but that's ok because you're habit building.
Why? - What matters more than anything, isn't what you eat (it does to some degree!), but how much you eat. Portion control is the name of the game here. Limiting yourself to one plate, three times a day will reduce your calorie intake, but it's a simple and easy system to remember that doesn't require any maths or brainpower.
Weekends
“S” Days
These are days that begin with the letter S. That means Saturday, Sunday and Special Days. Special days are religious or national holidays or your birthday, or the birthdays of close friends and relatives. On S days the 3 rules of No Snacks, No Sweets, No Seconds are abolished and you can eat what you want, when you want. If you're having more than two non-weekend S days in a month, you're overdoing it.
This diet will not make you lose 7 pounds in a week, but it will give you long term progress. As the author says, don't focus on results, focus on behaviours and building the habits. Results will follow. You're not in this to get slim within a week or even a month. You're in this for the rest of your life, so chillout and take it slow.
Note that the diet does not offer recipes and does not tell you what you can and can't eat, it tells you WHEN to eat and HOW MUCH to eat. The treats that you save for the weekend are used as rewards, as something you savour and eat to enjoy. Knowing that you can have something sweet, sticky and wicked at the weekend is more likely to make you stick to the 3 rules during the week. Focus on getting the “N” Days as perfect as you possibly can all the time, and then look forward to relaxing at weekends.
The only weak area of the book is it's lack of guidance on alcohol consumption. The author doesn't drink more than 2 drinks a day. I would suggest if you're having 2 drinks a day, every day without fail then you still have a problem. Try 2 drinks a day on your S days and you'll be fine.
shelliefromtirau
5つ星のうち5.0
Seriously, throw out all your other diet books.
2015年10月17日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
It is impossible to overstate just how miraculous and ground breaking this book is, not because of breakthrough science, or magical food combinations or a new and inspired way to use coconut oil, but because of its simplicity. For the first time in my life, I've read a method of weight loss that makes sense, is safe (physically and psychologically) and more importantly of all, is sustainable.
I think we all know that most diets will work (at weight loss at least, if not achieving health), if you can stick to it FOREVER, and ONLY if its forever. That's the hard part. I KNOW I cant count calories, carbs, points or fat grams forever, because I have tried - and failed. I know I cant only eat bacon and eggs, or fruit and vegetables, or only white foods, or low glycemic index forever, because I've tried and failed at that too. I also know I cant carb cycle, stick to (or even understand diets with phases) or assess the macro's for every bite - forever.
With the No S Diet, you don't have to, and not only that, it confirms for me the suspicion that Ive always had when attempting these diets, that its all just a bit silly. Its incredibly weird to insist 'I'm on a diet' while adding butter and Splenda to your coffee and shunning a banana. If you ignore all the diet gurus who explain all the latest science behind 'butter good, banana bad' and just think about it, we know that's strange, right?!
So, the No S Diet. Its not actually a diet, and that's why it can be done FOREVER. Its just a few simple, simple food rules. No snacks, no sweets and no seconds. You can still have crumbed chicken and mashed potatoes with the family - its just not having a second helping and finishing off the kids leftovers while you load the dishwasher. Its that simple. You also don't have to freak out about how much sugar is in your pasta sauce - no sweets simply means no Obvious Sweets. Nothing you instantly recognize as a sweet treat, so that's no home baking, cookies, ice cream, chocolate etc, easy to identify and no cause for concern. No snacking....That one seems like it might be difficult, but its surprisingly not - and I LOVE to snack. Its astounding how quickly your mind accepts that snacking is not an option once you simply decide that meals are it.
There are possibly two points that people coming off dictatorial diets might struggle with. Firstly, not being told what to eat. It like they fear that left to their own devices they will become malnourished within hours. I think this is a result of all that exposure to 'high science diets'. We become convinced that intricacies of nutrition is a life and death matter on a daily basis. Trust yourself to put enough of the good stuff on your plate to stay alive ;) Secondly, portion control. My first thought was, 'I can fit a lot onto one plate'. But the author is correct - shame really is a great watch dog. If your meal is the same size as your 6ft farmer husband (as mine is), you're gonna feel REALLY embarrassed.
Its just so simple and easily achievable (although I doubt it will be fast, but that's ok when the results are permanent) its astounding. I think in todays dieting culture, we expect a whole bunch of 'science' to surround a weight loss approach - there are even diets that start with a blood test and dole out hormones! Its just not necessary. Its not sustainable, and because of that it DOESNT WORK. We just need to eat less - that's it, and these simple rules are a methodology for achieving, and maintaining forever, just that. That's all it is, and its genius.
(And then there's the weekends, when you can happily get your bake on and have a slice of brownie if you like, guilt free :D )
I think we all know that most diets will work (at weight loss at least, if not achieving health), if you can stick to it FOREVER, and ONLY if its forever. That's the hard part. I KNOW I cant count calories, carbs, points or fat grams forever, because I have tried - and failed. I know I cant only eat bacon and eggs, or fruit and vegetables, or only white foods, or low glycemic index forever, because I've tried and failed at that too. I also know I cant carb cycle, stick to (or even understand diets with phases) or assess the macro's for every bite - forever.
With the No S Diet, you don't have to, and not only that, it confirms for me the suspicion that Ive always had when attempting these diets, that its all just a bit silly. Its incredibly weird to insist 'I'm on a diet' while adding butter and Splenda to your coffee and shunning a banana. If you ignore all the diet gurus who explain all the latest science behind 'butter good, banana bad' and just think about it, we know that's strange, right?!
So, the No S Diet. Its not actually a diet, and that's why it can be done FOREVER. Its just a few simple, simple food rules. No snacks, no sweets and no seconds. You can still have crumbed chicken and mashed potatoes with the family - its just not having a second helping and finishing off the kids leftovers while you load the dishwasher. Its that simple. You also don't have to freak out about how much sugar is in your pasta sauce - no sweets simply means no Obvious Sweets. Nothing you instantly recognize as a sweet treat, so that's no home baking, cookies, ice cream, chocolate etc, easy to identify and no cause for concern. No snacking....That one seems like it might be difficult, but its surprisingly not - and I LOVE to snack. Its astounding how quickly your mind accepts that snacking is not an option once you simply decide that meals are it.
There are possibly two points that people coming off dictatorial diets might struggle with. Firstly, not being told what to eat. It like they fear that left to their own devices they will become malnourished within hours. I think this is a result of all that exposure to 'high science diets'. We become convinced that intricacies of nutrition is a life and death matter on a daily basis. Trust yourself to put enough of the good stuff on your plate to stay alive ;) Secondly, portion control. My first thought was, 'I can fit a lot onto one plate'. But the author is correct - shame really is a great watch dog. If your meal is the same size as your 6ft farmer husband (as mine is), you're gonna feel REALLY embarrassed.
Its just so simple and easily achievable (although I doubt it will be fast, but that's ok when the results are permanent) its astounding. I think in todays dieting culture, we expect a whole bunch of 'science' to surround a weight loss approach - there are even diets that start with a blood test and dole out hormones! Its just not necessary. Its not sustainable, and because of that it DOESNT WORK. We just need to eat less - that's it, and these simple rules are a methodology for achieving, and maintaining forever, just that. That's all it is, and its genius.
(And then there's the weekends, when you can happily get your bake on and have a slice of brownie if you like, guilt free :D )
Me, here.
5つ星のうち5.0
Eating salvation
2023年1月22日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
For a long time, I've felt there must be a simple formula to eating, that is achievable and doesn't lead to weight gain, disordered eating or messing up your relationship with food, and whereby you can enjoy your food. Not being a logic person, I didn't see the formula, but the author of this book, being a librarian/computer programmer by background, and seemingly having that logic brain, has come up with something excellent. I like the pragmatism and did laugh at points. This was a book I didn't want to put down.
