¥ 3,025 + ¥ 257 配送料
  • 参考価格: ¥ 5,510
  • OFF: ¥ 2,485 (45%)
通常3~4日以内に発送します。 在庫状況について
この商品は、Nearfine が販売、発送します。 この出品商品にはコンビニ・ATM・ネットバンキング・電子マネー払いが利用できます。
¥ 3,025 + ¥ 257 配送料
この商品をお持ちですか? マーケットプレイスに出品する
裏表紙を表示 表紙を表示
サンプルを聴く 再生中... 一時停止   Audible オーディオエディションのサンプルをお聴きいただいています。
2点すべてのイメージを見る

Coining Corruption: The Making of the American Campaign Finance System (英語) ハードカバー – 2007/9/20


その他()の形式およびエディションを表示する 他のフォーマットおよびエディションを非表示にする
価格
新品 中古品
ハードカバー
¥ 3,025
¥ 3,024 ¥ 3,024
click to open popover

キャンペーンおよび追加情報

Kindle 端末は必要ありません。無料 Kindle アプリのいずれかをダウンロードすると、スマートフォン、タブレットPCで Kindle 本をお読みいただけます。

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Android

無料アプリを入手するには、Eメールアドレスを入力してください。


商品の説明

内容紹介

In the wake of Watergate, Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in an effort to prevent the corruption of future elections. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Buckley v. Valeo (1976), defined corruption as quid pro quo—“get for giving”—meaning Congress could only regulate the kind of corruption that had occurred if a campaign contributor received political favors from the candidate. This definition has since shaped and limited efforts at campaign finance reform, often with ironic and unintended consequences. By shifting the focus to the source and amount of contributions, the justices in the Buckley decision ignored disparities in funding and the resulting ability of particular candidates to dominate communication channels.

In Coining Corruption, legal and political historian Kurt Hohenstein provides a hitherto untold story about the successes and limitations of political reform. From 1876 until 1976, lawmakers and courts permitted regulation that potentially infringed upon freedom of speech: they understood corruption as the conversion of economic power into political power. In their view, corruption existed if a candidate’s unfettered campaign spending overwhelmed other voices and limited real deliberation. Yet, as Hohenstein shows, Buckley’s limited “quid pro quo” definition ignores these considerations.

Following the evolution of the campaign finance system through the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2001 and the Supreme Court’s decisions in McConnell v. FEC (2001) and Landell v. Sorrell (2006), Hohenstein calls for a return to a broad, historical understanding of corruption. American democracy demands regulation of the sources and amounts of campaign funding in order to prevent a monopoly on the vehicles of political debate. Those interested in reform politics, public policy, constitutional history, and Congress will appreciate this groundbreaking study.

レビュー

"A good overall evaluation on the history of money and politics in American elections."--"Choice"

"A terrific book about the history of campaign finance reform and how notions of political corruption and democratic theory have evolved and shifted over the past 130 years."--Adam Winkler, UCLA School of Law

"An eye-opening examination of the history, flaws, and bright points of America's modern political system."--"The Midwest Book Review"

A good overall evaluation on the history of money and politics in American elections. "Choice"

A terrific book about the history of campaign finance reform and how notions of political corruption and democratic theory have evolved and shifted over the past 130 years. Adam Winkler, UCLA School of Law

"An eye-opening examination of the history, flaws, and bright points of America's modern political system." "The Midwest Book Review""

商品の説明をすべて表示する

登録情報

  • ハードカバー: 310ページ
  • 出版社: Northern Illinois Univ Pr (2007/9/20)
  • 言語: 英語
  • ISBN-10: 0875803776
  • ISBN-13: 978-0875803777
  • 発売日: 2007/9/20
  • 商品パッケージの寸法: 15.2 x 2.3 x 22.9 cm
  • おすすめ度: この商品の最初のレビューを書き込んでください。
  • さらに安い価格について知らせる
    この商品を出品する場合、出品者サポートを通じて更新を提案したいですか?


カスタマーレビュー

まだカスタマーレビューはありません。
他のお客様にも意見を伝えましょう