Altered Traits: Science Reveals How Meditation Changes Your Mind, Brain, and Body (英語) ペーパーバック – 2017/9/5
Kindle 端末は必要ありません。無料 Kindle アプリのいずれかをダウンロードすると、スマートフォン、タブレットPCで Kindle 本をお読みいただけます。
Daniel Goleman is the New York Times bestselling author of the groundbreaking book Emotional Intelligence. A psychologist and science journalist, he reported on brain and behavioral research for The New York Times for many years, and has received several awards for his writing. He is the author of more than a dozen books, including three accounts of meetings he has moderated between the Dalai Lama and scientists, psychotherapists, and social activists. Goleman is a founding member of the board of the Mind and Life Institute, a cofounder of the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, and codirector of the Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations.
Richard Davidson has appeared on Broadway in I Hate Hamlet, Ghetto, and The Survivor, and off-Broadway in Bedfellows and Hurrah at Last. His television and film credits include Law & Order, Law & Order: SVU, and The Hurricane.
1件中1 - 1件目のレビューを表示
Davidson made headlines several years ago with the results of his study of the brains of Tibetan monks, which showed unequivocally that years of meditation had significantly altered their brains (for the better). Goleman is the bestselling author of Emotional Intelligence.
Altered Traits is a collaborative overview of the history of research on meditation and an analysis of what claims in the mainstream press are legitimate as opposed to those that are overreaching or simply wrong. (The altered traits of the title are those that endure long term, as opposed to those that are transient, taking place during meditation sessions and vanishing shortly thereafter.) The book is written entirely in third person, which is sometimes a bit odd, when it's clearly talking about the experiences of one author vs. the other.
I have to admit that I found the first several chapters tedious--the autobiographical stuff about their trips to India and personal explorations of meditation was okay, but there was a lot of detail about early research studies--what worked and what didn't--that got old for me. A different reader might eat it up, however. The book really got interesting when it embarked on Davidson's studies of Tibetan monks, and that's when I didn't want to put it down.
This is not in any way a how-to book about meditation. (There are plenty of those, as well as CDs and videos and apps, so that's not its purpose.) What it is is a scientific analysis, albeit designed for a general audience, about which claims about meditation are legitimate, which need more, and better, research and which can be debunked altogether. I've already recommended the book to a friend who recently began meditating at the suggestion of his doctor, but as a science teacher has been skeptical about its benefits. He, I would say, would be the ideal audience for Altered Traits.
I do think this book does a service in pointing out that much of the research done on meditation has major flaws, and there needs to be better studies done. They also point out that there are many different kinds of meditations that have very different effects, and that they need to be studied separately. This is very important and helpful. But I am dismayed at the bias towards a state that certain types of meditation help you achieve. The bias is that this is the best state to be in and the desirable goal for everyone. I disagree. The state that they describe is not what I am aiming for. And despite my public name (Ananda means 'bliss' in Sanskrit), I don't think that constant bliss or joy is the best goal. After all my years of meditation, I find that a calm peacefulness is best for me, and a better indication of emotional regulation than a state of bliss or joy. The authors of this book seem to think that the Gamma wave state/trait that their long-time meditators have is the ultimate goal. If so, I would say that we are going to have to use neurofeedback to get there, because meditation takes too long. Don't get me wrong. I encourage certain types of meditation and meditate regularly myself, but it takes more than meditation, for most of us, to really achieve the results that we are looking for in a more realistic time frame. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is looking promising for having a positive effect on brain structures, too. And I highly recommend looking into Attachment Theory and working towards secure attachment, which is where emotional regulation comes from, in my opinion. Basically, it is difficult to calm an overreactive amygdala through meditation alone, although I do believe it is a necessary and helpful part of the process.
I recently read "Brain Rules" by Jon Medina, and I was looking for the research explanations and notations in this book to be on the level of Medina's book. This book falls really short in this area. Also, I recommend "The Happiness Trap" by Russ Harris for a different approach to learning to be less reactive. It is similar to MBSR, but I like it better and it was life-changing for me.
Overall, I am glad that they are stating that achieving nice 'states' of mind during meditation is good, but the ultimate goal is to have this state become a trait, so that we are less reactive overall (again, this is called 'emotional regulation' in attachment theory). I also like that they point out the flaws in much of the research on meditation so far, and that future research needs to be of higher quality (and they specifically state the criteria for high quality research). And most importantly they state that the different types of meditation need to be studied separately. But the disappointments that I mentioned above are the reason for the lower rating that I gave the book.
Davidson and Goleman do a very good job of explaining the history of meditation research, the findings, the strengths and weaknesses of many of the studies, current trends, and -- in answer to the question I wanted to ask -- what they, as scientists, really think the research has given us, so far, by way of reliable findings. The field is still young and science takes a long time to come to consensus, so the "solid" results are few and far between, but there are trends, and they are intriguing. This book gives me a good set of summaries I can offer my students.
I must say that, towards the end, the book got a bit repetitive; it could have been a good 50 pages shorter, easily. Looks as if they were trying hard to hit the 300 page mark. But that does not detract from the substance of the book, and, for me, that's the analysis of and summations of the current research findings.