Focusing in particular on the crucial interval from 1945 to 1960, Tiffany finds that a combination of public policy failure, excessive labor demands, and management shortcomings accounted for the industry's subsequent problems. Immediately after the war, the Truman administration, worried about what it believed would be pent up demand for steel, pressured the steel producers to expand capacity by building new mills. The industry was skeptical about increased demand and only reluctantly took the less expensive "rounding out" approach (adding on to existing mills), instead of the more costly and time-consuming "greenfield" approach (building mills from scratch). As a result, the industry was saddled with obsolete mills and could not compete effectively with Germany or Japan. The leaders of the United Steel Workers union were equally short-sighted, says Tiffany, particularly during the disasterous strike of 1959, which permanently opened the doors to foreign steel.
Neither steel managers, nor union leaders, nor several Administrations escape blame in this study. If thay had worked together, Tiffany argues, the industry might have maintained its dominant position in the world market. Instead, they provide a valuable lesson for executives, union leaders, and politicians involved in any aspect of the national economy.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
There are no customer reviews yet.
|
|||
|
Video reviews
|
|
|
After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. |