![]() | 会員なら、この商品は10%Amazonポイント還元 (ポイントが表示されている場合は、表示ポイント+10%還元)。 |
登録情報
|
「まず背教のことが起こり、不法の者、すなわち滅びの子が現れるにちがいない。彼は、すべて神と呼ばれたり拝まれたりするものに反抗して立ち上がり、自分は神だと宣言する。」
聖パウロが上記の箇所で述べているとおり、イエス・キリストの再臨の前に、必ず、個人としての反キリスト、偽メシアの出現があるというのが正統キリスト教の教えです。このことは現在の「カトリック教会のカテキズム」675でも繰り返されています。(カテキズムの英訳はヴァチカンのサイトで読めます。)
本書は、東方正教会信徒による、古代教父たちの終末論・反キリスト論の整理として非常に貴重なものであり、一読をおすすめします。
Rather than setting out his own interpretation, as is so vogue in many fractalized Protestant circles today, Engleman, in the true tradition of the Orthodox Church, quotes extensively from the Church Fathers on eschatological matters. Heretical and 'gitchee' modern doctrines like the Rapture are debunked as non-canonical, non-scriptural, and the vain imaginings of a 19th century Scotish woman.
As a practicing Orthodox Christian myself, I received immense guidance from this book and am very thankful to Dennis Engleman for this timely and much needed contribution.
First, the title is a misnomer, since in the forward, Father Hopko, who endorses the book, also tells the reader that the book is an "Orthodox Perspective" not neccesaarily "Orthodox Teaching." I'm not to sure what that is supposed to mean. The Orthodox Church does not agree with this escthalocial construct, but it is written with an Orthodox twist? It is not clear. Therefore, the book is purchased with a kind of false pretense. The title "Orthodox Perspective" gives the suspecting buyer the ideal he is reading "Orthodox teaching."
While the author quotes several Saints of the Church, scripture, and teachers, he is sometimes dis-jointed in connecting the dots. He often quotes too much and fails in providing enough personnal commentary.
While I tend to agree with his position compared to the curent rage of Pre-tribulational theology, I do not find too much different from traditional Amillinialism. The twist comes here in this text with a focus on Eastern Christrianity. This is the books strength. The West has ofetn view the "last days" through an American eyes version. The middle East climatic battles are read on what is America's role. This book tends to demonstarte the Church's role as we are Christians first, and Nationalist second.
That is the books strength and for it allow this book should be read.
|
|
|