|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
よく一緒に購入されている商品
商品の説明
内容説明
The McDonnell Phantom is considered to be one of the most successful jet fighters of the 1960s and 1970s. Over 5000 planes were built, many of them under licence. Originally designed as a carrier-borne interceptor for the US Navy, the early trials were so promising that the US Air Force adopted it as a tactical fighter and this was quickly followed by numerous other air forces around the world, including Israel, Japan, West Germany and Egypt, which explains why some examples are still in service today.
登録情報
|
この商品を見た後に買っているのは？
この商品にタグをつける(詳細)タグは、商品との関連性が非常に強いキーワードまたはラベルのようなものです。
タグにより、すべてのお客様がお気に入りの商品の整理と確認を行うことができます。 ※タグは初期設定で公開になっています。詳しくはこちら |
カスタマーレビュー
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:
1個のレビュー
20 人中、10人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
FAIR WARNING - VOL 1 WAS A DISASTER!
2010/7/10
形式:Perfect
Open disclosure: I have only personally examined the Navy/USMC Phantom book (VOL 1) that is a companion to this one, but the factual errors found there were enough to turn me off from any future purchases from this author or publisher. I did not buy the book because, quite simply, I WILL NOT BUY any product from this author or publisher. Period.
First of all, look at the book description. It repeats the text in the USN/USMC Phantoms book that says more than 5000 Phantoms were made. Why couldn't they be more specific and say that final production quantity was 5,057**? McDonnell is mistyped, with only one "L" and Douglas is omitted entirely. Yes, the original F-4 was designed by McDonnell but, after their merger with Douglas in 1964*, McDonnell-Douglas continued to build the aircraft and refine it.
(Corrections - 1964 is a typo for 1967.
**Total production of 5,057 is US only and should include 138 Mitsubishi airframes as well, something else not mentioned in the book - INTELTEK 12/07/10)
There were so many factual errors in Vol 1, and no many misidentifications of different variants in the color plate illustrations that it seems the author simply doesn't know his material very well. There is absolutely no reason to have confidence that Vol 2 would magically improve over Vol 1. Another reviewer of the MiG-21 book in this series revealed that the author and illustrator got details of that aircraft wrong as well. Therefore, it is not just an occasional fluke, but a systemic problem with knowing the aircraft sufficiently well enough to do a credible book on the subject. As for the proofing, editing and translation problems, when you can't even spell McDonnell with two "L"s and even the cover title reads "exports versions," rather than the more proper singular use of "export," it really tells you something about the sloppiness of this team, if not their ineptitude. I will never consider another product from this publisher again, unless they make some radical changes in their quality.
First of all, look at the book description. It repeats the text in the USN/USMC Phantoms book that says more than 5000 Phantoms were made. Why couldn't they be more specific and say that final production quantity was 5,057**? McDonnell is mistyped, with only one "L" and Douglas is omitted entirely. Yes, the original F-4 was designed by McDonnell but, after their merger with Douglas in 1964*, McDonnell-Douglas continued to build the aircraft and refine it.
(Corrections - 1964 is a typo for 1967.
**Total production of 5,057 is US only and should include 138 Mitsubishi airframes as well, something else not mentioned in the book - INTELTEK 12/07/10)
There were so many factual errors in Vol 1, and no many misidentifications of different variants in the color plate illustrations that it seems the author simply doesn't know his material very well. There is absolutely no reason to have confidence that Vol 2 would magically improve over Vol 1. Another reviewer of the MiG-21 book in this series revealed that the author and illustrator got details of that aircraft wrong as well. Therefore, it is not just an occasional fluke, but a systemic problem with knowing the aircraft sufficiently well enough to do a credible book on the subject. As for the proofing, editing and translation problems, when you can't even spell McDonnell with two "L"s and even the cover title reads "exports versions," rather than the more proper singular use of "export," it really tells you something about the sloppiness of this team, if not their ineptitude. I will never consider another product from this publisher again, unless they make some radical changes in their quality.
このレビューはお役に立ちましたか？
ご意見はクチコミでお聞かせください。
リストマニア
関連商品を探す
同じキーワードの商品を探す
フィードバック
- カタログ情報、または画像について報告
- 著者からのコメント
- 出版社からのコメント
|
