Howard adds considerable insight to the growing body of work on new media and democracy, shifting our attention toward the most undemocratic regimes, nascent democracies, and young polyarchies that aspire to earn the label "democracy" (a term really better used in theory than as a label for actual governments). Unlike so many authors, Howard avoids over-hyping new information technology and shows that it can be used ably by both those who would reform and those who would repress, though he can't help but notice that it has been used more often--and to greater effect--by the former. Again filling a gap in the literature, he focuses particularly on countries with large Muslim populations, and his analysis suggests that freedom of expression is a value and an impulse that exists across all cultures. He finds new media to be a tool of choice both for dissenters within repressive countries but also for diaspora communities and "governments in exile." (Note to dictators: Placing someone in exile is mostly just changing the ISP they use. Second note to dictators: Sorry, but many dissidents are now linking through connections outside your country, so, um, good luck with that.) Instead of naively claiming that Twitter will save us all, Howard simply points out that Facebook et al. will be a part of all democratic revolutions from this point forward. Social media, cellphones, and the like are as important as pamphlets in 1776 and posters in East Germany, but they have an unparalleled potential for circulating, organizing, and broadcasting dissent, both within countries and in the wider world.
In sum, it's a must-read for those who want to understand democratization in the digital age and political culture in Muslim countries and the developing world.