Play Poker Like the Pros: The greatest poker player in the world today reveals his million-dollar-winning strategies to the most popular tournament, home and online games (Harperresource Book) [ペーパーバック]

In the 90's, a great deal of statistical analysis was done on the relative value of pocket cards. As a result, a whole group of books were published that ranked pocket cards into tiers of value. Based on what tier your cards fell into, you were supposed to bet in different ways. Hellmuth still uses the tier system, but he has re-arranged what cards go into what tiers. His perspective is that while certain hands are statistically more likely to be winners, some hands are more likely to pull down big pots, making them of greater value than a statistically superior hand. In particular, Hellmuth values pocket pairs very highly. His point is that you don't often flop your set, but when you do, look out- here comes a very profitable hand. After playing with his system for a while, I must say that I agree with the inflated values of pocket pairs, given one simple rule. If you don't flop your set or have top pair, fold. It's pretty simple, but really tough to make yourself throw away your pair when you just raised pre-flop. Have some discipline and this system will work.

The other main benefit that Hellmuth's aggressive pre-flop play brings to the table is the ability to buy a hand with a single bet after the flop, especially from early position. If you come in raising pre-flop from an early position, you are pretty much representing either a high pair or a suited ace or ace/king. If the flop comes without a high card, you will be shocked at how often you can just buy the pot with one bet after the cards come out.

Finally, your aggressive pre-flop play may allow you to isolate yourself against the maniac at the table. By pushing up the pre-flop bets, you can often drive out marginal hands, but a maniac will almost always call you down. If you know you are up against this type of player, your odds of taking down the pot are good if you are heads-up.

The trouble with Hellmuth's system is when you are up against tight players. Lots of tight players will just allow you to build up the pots and simply call you down with the best of hands. It becomes difficult to read other players when they simply call you down all the way. You have to have the discipline to throw away a hand that might be a winner. Hellmuth says that in order to win at poker, you have to be willing to fold some winners. How true.

The same warnings are true for games that are very loose. If you can't scare anyone out of the pot, and you get called down on every hand, your best strategy is just to tighten up and raise the nuts and call the nut draw when pot odds allow. Not too complicated, but if you are lucky enough to find a game that loose, than you don't need this book.

Lastly, Hellmuth's system is very dependant on your table image. You have to really vary your play depending on how the others at the table think you play. If you come in raising and get called down with a looser, don't expect to drive out players post-flop. So, you had better tighten up. That way, you'll get more action on excellent hands. On the other hand, if you have some nice hands early, get even more aggressive as you will be able to buy many a pot.

So much is dependant on what your table image is that it takes out much of the true mechanics of typical systems. While this can make the game much more fun, and if you're good at it make you more money, it can crush you if you do it wrong. Hellmuth warns that while you should take down more money in the long-run, your swings will be much greater. I'll vouch for that, especially if you are not aware of your table-image.

I was disappointed with Hellmuth's chapters on tournament play and Omaha and Stud. You'll do better elsewhere.

All in all, I recommend this book to someone that is experienced in the sound fundamentals of Hold'Em play, and is capable of varying their playing style based on table image. If you're not to this point yet, try Winning at Low Stakes Hold'Em by Lee Jones and the "Theory" books by David Sklansky.

Four Stars,
HawkeyeGK

I make no pretences about the fact that I am an average Hold'em player. I play limit anywhere from 3/6 to 10/20 and make a nice profit over time, but I am definately not the kind of player that walks from a table to a round of applause :)

Phil on the other hand needs no introduction. His reputation (great at cards, shocking at manners!) is known to anyone who takes an interest in the game.

Like many players though, I rushed out and bought his book when it hit the shelves, and like most I was hugely disappointed... It's a story of "I'm Phil Hellmuth, I'm great, and I'm gonna keep telling you I'm great, and now I have your money for a book full of rubbish!" I threw it the corner with the same feeling you get when another player draws to an inside straight and hits - bad beat!

Let's face it. What seperates Mr Hellmuth and other big name players from the rest of us is an instinctive ability to accurately read a player, to the extent that they can almost read the suit of your cards, let alone the value. From there they pressure you when you're weak and back off when you're strong.

For us mere mortals we need to rely more on the technical aspects of poker that make the foundation of any good player's game. Play Poker like the Pros is extremely light-on here. In fact more information can be found for free in an hour searching a few online forums.

If you want to actually improve your game, any books by Sklansky, Malmuth or "Middle Limit Holdem" by Ciaffone & Brier and the like are the way to go. If your new to the game and need a solid introduction, you can't go past "Winning Low-Limit Hold'em" by Lee Jones. Just don't waste your money with Hellmuth.

So how am I making a killing?

Well, there seems to now be a wave of new players, "Phil Hellmuth's Pheasants" I call them - the sixth animal not discussed in his book - and they're just waiting to be plucked.

Invariably there seems to be at least 1 at every table. You'll see them three betting pocket 5's pre-flop and raising on the flop with second and middle pair "to see where their at". These players are the ones that were never good enough to begin with, hence they actually believe the diatribe, and have not improved with their latest book purchase.

Once identified these muppets can be targeted so easily, because they become so predictable pre and post flop and almost all of them have zero talent on the turn and river play. (Interestingly, areas that are hardly touched by Phil's book.)

In the 12 months prior to the release of "Play Poker like the Pro's" I averaged a profit of $57 per hour. Like I said at the start, fairly average for the stakes I play. Since his book and the adjustments to my game to target the Pheasants that average has risen to $74ph.

All I can say is "Hurry up and release your next book Phil, so we can both get rich!"

I really enjoyed the stories about him aggressively raising with weak hands, and pulling down pots. Unfortunately, many of these stories were in the "Beginner" sections. The type of aggression he advocates DOES NOT WORK in a low-level game which has either clueless opponents, or even a couple of better-than-average players. For example, reraising pre-flop in hold 'em with a pair of 7's, and then betting into a scary flop in a multiway pot will absolutely get you killed! Phil is a masterful tournament player, but he would get crushed in the $-$ games that I play in if he followed his own advice.

Throughout the Hold Em and Razz sections especially, he advises players to get a lot of money into the pot early, giving them a reason to stay in the hand later, even if their cards don't improve (specific examples were Ace-King in Hold 'Em and solid low-draws in Razz). What kind of thinking is that? In the Pot Limit Omaha section, he gives the advice, "Look for a reason to fold." Guess what, Phil? That is how any beginning player should think for ALL games.

My last main beef is that the "Advanced" sections preach a change in playing style, but it all revolves around his ability to read other players. Easy for him to say since that ability is what makes him a world-class player! But there's no in-depth discussion about how I can get better at reading players.

As I said above, it is an interesting book, and I'll probably read it again and catch some things I missed the first time. Still, newer players should start elsewhere with books by authors like Lee Jones, Mason Malmuth, and Mike Caro.