This is one of the most difficult books I've read --- not because of poor writing or lack of clarity, but because foreign policy during President George W. Bush's administration will remain controversial for the rest of our lives. Bush and his people are judged primarily in terms of the overwhelmingly polarizing Iraq War. Either you believe that the war was justified because Saddam Hussein posed a direct threat to the USA or you believe that "W" was at best a dumb cowboy and at worst a "war criminal" who led us into a gratuitous war.
If you believe the war was justified then everything that Dr. Rice --- who served as Bush's National Security Advisor in his first term and his Secretary of State in the second term --- writes in this book will make perfect sense to you, especially Condi's assessment of the necessity for going to war:
==============
THE PRESENTATION of the case against Saddam had three elements. First, we would review his transgressions against the international community and against his own people. Saddam had signed a ceasefire agreement in 1991 and was systematically violating every aspect of it. Second, we would inform the world of what we knew about his continuing pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, his support for terrorism, and his oppression of his own people. Finally, we would paint a picture of the dangers inherent in failing to address the decade-old threat of Saddam Hussein.
==============
If you've already convinced yourself that Bush was a warmongering cowboy then you won't think much of this book and have no reason to buy it. Because people have already hardened their positions either supporting or opposing the Iraq War, the book isn't likely to be read with an inquisitive spirit of trying to learn anything new.
The second difficulty with the book is that most of us only care about foreign policy to the extent that something going on overseas alarms us. Our collective idea of foreign policy is: "I hope those darn Israelis, Palestinians, Indians, Pakistanis, Arabs, Russians, South Americans, Chinese, North Koreans, etc. stay quiet and don't doing anything REALLY stupid like starting a nuclear war." As long as the rest of the world "behaves itself" we don't much care what they do. Thus, reading a book about the intricate day-to-day events of foreign affairs is tedious. It was for me, and I've lived and worked on four continents and read some of the foreign press each week. Having kept current on foreign affairs I learned very little that I did not already know.
The third difficulty is with Dr. Rice herself. I admire her as the personification of excellence. She grew up in modest circumstances in Birmingham, Alabama and went on to master every endeavor she has ever undertaken. Her intellectual and organizational skills must be almost superhuman. She has that outstanding level of courage and confidence that is a prerequisite for success. And yet she is so unpretentious that you feel like you're listening to an "ordinary" person talking. She doesn't have the mystique of a Henry Kissinger or some of our other exotic Secretaries of State. The book is written like that too, in a matter-of-fact style that is informative but not really exciting.
The "human interest" aspect of the book isn't especially intriguing either. Condi has already written about the personal aspects of herself and her family in other books and doesn't duplicate any of it here. There isn't much of a story in writing about others in Bush's administration. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is portrayed as a "friend" who was well-meaning, but lacking in "people skills." There was friction between Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, and Dr. Rice, but they got along well enough to do their jobs of advising the President.
Other than the chapters about Iraq, which I was already in agreement with, the aspect of the book that intrigued me was Dr. Rice's assessment of Russia's Vladimir Putin who is presented as a true friend of the United States, having a genuine sympathy for our cause against Al Qaeda, and doing as much as Russia's interests would allow in trying to rein in Iran's belligerence. I also found the story about Washington under attack on 9/11 to be of interest, but that story has been told elsewhere.
Perhaps the most meaningful aspect of this book has to be inferred from considering it as a whole. Condi and other members of Bush's Administration came to Washington in January 2001 at an optimistic time, expecting to continue the work of improving relations with Russia, eliminating most nuclear weapons, expanding trade with Latin America and Asia, and furthering a world of peace and prosperity. These initiatives were barely underway when the 9/11 attack broke from the blue, thrusting them into the center of the long War on Terror with its difficult military deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan and with controversial judicial issues such as detaining terrorists at Gitmo. 9/11 was a tragedy that interrupted their desired agendas as much as it disrupted everyone else's.
I rate this book four stars because it tells Condi Rice's story as National Security Advisor and Secretary of state with clarity. What's missing is the personal touch that tells us who Dr. Rice is as a person. I heard Dr. Rice give exactly that kind of personal story when Sean Hannity asked her on his Fox show if she thought it was likely that Democracy would take root in Libya after Moamar Kaddafi's removal. Dr. Rice answered (paraphrasing): "When I was growing up in the early 1960s my father couldn't register to vote in racially segregated Birmingham, Alabama. I grew up to become the Secretary of State. Democracy takes time, but it is the only road to freedom." The book would have been improved by Dr. Rice including some of these moving insights from her own inspiring life's story. She chose instead to write the book clinically, as a lawyer or professional historian would right it. Nothing at all wrong with that approach, but it is a tedious read.
I think you'll enjoy this book if:
1. You're a foreign policy buff and want to know the day-to-day events of Dr. Rice's work as National Security Advisor and Secretary of State.
2. You have a genuine interest in knowing the circumstances of our going to war in Iraq and are willing to approach the subject with an open mind.
This is a meaningful book for foreign policy buffs, but a difficult read for those with a casual interest in foreign policy.