|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
登録情報
|
この商品にタグをつける(詳細)タグは、商品との関連性が非常に強いキーワードまたはラベルのようなものです。
タグにより、すべてのお客様がお気に入りの商品の整理と確認を行うことができます。 ※タグは初期設定で公開になっています。詳しくはこちら |
カスタマーレビュー
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:
1個のレビュー
22 人中、22人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
A paradigm of scholarly translation
2011/3/19
形式:ペーパーバック
Finally a scholarly translator who realizes that just because a certain style and word-order is natural to speakers of one language does not mean that these must be duplicated as much as possible in English. They end up, as Jones says, sounding like Yoda from "Star Wars" -- at best. Translators should realize that not all people who want to study these texts are graduate students in Buddhist studies, nor do many want the texts to sound like they from the "mysterious Orient." All translations in fact should be like this one. Just breaking a text into sentences and paragraphs, rather than leaving it as separate verses, helps in understanding the texts. Even something as simple as identifying who is speaking a verse (Nagarjuna or his opponent) helps greatly.
Producing all of Nagarjuna's philosophical corpus in one place, as is done here, is very helpful for understanding his thought. The summaries from Tibetan texts are very full and almost translations. One caveat: I wish he had translated the rest of the Ratnavali. I agree that the rest of the Ratnavali is not of great philosophical interest, but still it would be useful to read it in this style. Perhaps Jones will produce a volume of Nagarjuna's religious writings. But a good chunk of the Ratnavali is translated here.
Jones includes notes a glossary to explain the original and difficult concepts. His concluding essay on the nature of Nagarjuna's thought is also very insightful and convincing.
Producing all of Nagarjuna's philosophical corpus in one place, as is done here, is very helpful for understanding his thought. The summaries from Tibetan texts are very full and almost translations. One caveat: I wish he had translated the rest of the Ratnavali. I agree that the rest of the Ratnavali is not of great philosophical interest, but still it would be useful to read it in this style. Perhaps Jones will produce a volume of Nagarjuna's religious writings. But a good chunk of the Ratnavali is translated here.
Jones includes notes a glossary to explain the original and difficult concepts. His concluding essay on the nature of Nagarjuna's thought is also very insightful and convincing.
このレビューはお役に立ちましたか？
ご意見はクチコミでお聞かせください。
リストマニア
関連商品を探す
同じキーワードの商品を探す
フィードバック
- カタログ情報、または画像について報告
- 著者からのコメント
- 出版社からのコメント
|
