|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
商品の説明
内容紹介
フランスの高級レストランガイドの香港・マカオ版。3つ星2店、2つ星8店、1つ星18店を含む計251店を、英中のバイリンガルで紹介。
登録情報
|
この商品を見た後に買っているのは？
カスタマーレビュー
最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー
5 人中、4人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
形式:ペーパーバック
アジアの食を代表する香港のミシュランです。
しかし、結果は、☆☆☆は、Four Seasons Hotelの龍景軒のみという結果でした。
しかも、龍景軒がオープンした時に鳴り物入りで登場したシェフは、現在、マカオのFSHに移籍しています。
一方、隠れた名店といわれていた店が、次々、紹介されており、香港在住の私としては内緒にして欲しかった反面、旅行者には、うれしい一冊です。
尚、日本食のレストランも数多く掲載されていますが、純粋な和食ではありません。
ほとんどがアレンジされておりますので、香港の和食としての評価です。
まぁ、ガイドブックとしては、良い内容です。
香港に旅行する際には、1冊持ちましょう。
その際に、本当の香港を満喫するのであれば、ホテルレストランは、外した方がいいでしょう。
しかし、結果は、☆☆☆は、Four Seasons Hotelの龍景軒のみという結果でした。
しかも、龍景軒がオープンした時に鳴り物入りで登場したシェフは、現在、マカオのFSHに移籍しています。
一方、隠れた名店といわれていた店が、次々、紹介されており、香港在住の私としては内緒にして欲しかった反面、旅行者には、うれしい一冊です。
尚、日本食のレストランも数多く掲載されていますが、純粋な和食ではありません。
ほとんどがアレンジされておりますので、香港の和食としての評価です。
まぁ、ガイドブックとしては、良い内容です。
香港に旅行する際には、1冊持ちましょう。
その際に、本当の香港を満喫するのであれば、ホテルレストランは、外した方がいいでしょう。
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:
2件のカスタマーレビュー
4 人中、3人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
Great source of information only if you have no other sources
2009/8/8
形式:ペーパーバック|Amazonが確認した購入
Rating restaurants (and hotels) is a notoriously difficult business. No matter what you do, there will be some very valid criticisms. It is therefore truly remarkable how consistent and deservedly well-respected Michelin guides in Europe are. While nobody could agree with every rating, there is really nothing better, and hasn't been for a very long time.
Unfortunately, the quality of the Guides decrease the further from Paris you go. The American ones are still quite usable, but are not as good as the competition. The Guides in Asia are hardly worth opening.
The reviewers in Hong Kong and Macau were clearly not the best European reviewers period, but they were also still European, and so had difficulty reviewing any kind of Chinese cuisine. At the end of the day, Michelin simply ranked the places with established names high, and less famous ones low. Tastes may differ, but it is impossible to imagine that there exists a single person in the food-eating world that would give three stars to Robuchon in Macau while giving less to the ones in New York and Paris. And I don't think there is a single person who lived in Hong Kong for more than a year that would place Lung King Heen (a decent but very white-tourist-oriented restaurant in Four Seasons) as the top Cantonese restaurant in the city.
This said, the guide follows famous touristy places rather well. If you are visiting Hong Kong for the first time, and have nowhere to turn for advice, this guide is probably better than nothing. You might end up spending more money, and eating much less well than you could, but at least you won't be completely lost. Which is the only reason I give this guide two stars rather than one.
Unfortunately, the quality of the Guides decrease the further from Paris you go. The American ones are still quite usable, but are not as good as the competition. The Guides in Asia are hardly worth opening.
The reviewers in Hong Kong and Macau were clearly not the best European reviewers period, but they were also still European, and so had difficulty reviewing any kind of Chinese cuisine. At the end of the day, Michelin simply ranked the places with established names high, and less famous ones low. Tastes may differ, but it is impossible to imagine that there exists a single person in the food-eating world that would give three stars to Robuchon in Macau while giving less to the ones in New York and Paris. And I don't think there is a single person who lived in Hong Kong for more than a year that would place Lung King Heen (a decent but very white-tourist-oriented restaurant in Four Seasons) as the top Cantonese restaurant in the city.
This said, the guide follows famous touristy places rather well. If you are visiting Hong Kong for the first time, and have nowhere to turn for advice, this guide is probably better than nothing. You might end up spending more money, and eating much less well than you could, but at least you won't be completely lost. Which is the only reason I give this guide two stars rather than one.
3 人中、2人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
Great source of information... if you have no other sources.
2009/8/4
形式:ペーパーバック
Rating restaurants (and hotels) is a notoriously difficult business. No matter what you do, there will be some very valid criticisms. It is therefore truly remarkable how consistent and deservedly well-respected Michelin guides in Europe are. While nobody could agree with every rating, there is really nothing better, and hasn't been for a very long time.
Unfortunately, the quality of the Guides decrease the further from Paris you go. The American ones are still quite usable, but are not as good as the competition. The Guides in Asia are hardly worth opening.
The reviewers in Hong Kong and Macau were clearly not the best European reviewers period, but they were also still European, and so had difficulty reviewing any kind of Chinese cuisine. At the end of the day, Michelin simply ranked the places with established names high, and less famous ones low. Tastes may differ, but it is impossible to imagine that there exists a single person in the food-eating world that would give three stars to Robuchon in Macau while giving less to the ones in New York and Paris. And I don't think there is a single person who lived in Hong Kong for more than a year that would place Lung King Heen (a decent but very white-tourist-oriented restaurant in Four Seasons) as the top Cantonese restaurant in the city.
This said, the guide follows famous touristy places rather well. If you are visiting Hong Kong for the first time, and have nowhere to turn for advice, this guide is probably better than nothing. You might end up spending more money, and eating much less well than you could, but at least you won't be completely lost. Which is the only reason I give this guide two stars rather than one.
Unfortunately, the quality of the Guides decrease the further from Paris you go. The American ones are still quite usable, but are not as good as the competition. The Guides in Asia are hardly worth opening.
The reviewers in Hong Kong and Macau were clearly not the best European reviewers period, but they were also still European, and so had difficulty reviewing any kind of Chinese cuisine. At the end of the day, Michelin simply ranked the places with established names high, and less famous ones low. Tastes may differ, but it is impossible to imagine that there exists a single person in the food-eating world that would give three stars to Robuchon in Macau while giving less to the ones in New York and Paris. And I don't think there is a single person who lived in Hong Kong for more than a year that would place Lung King Heen (a decent but very white-tourist-oriented restaurant in Four Seasons) as the top Cantonese restaurant in the city.
This said, the guide follows famous touristy places rather well. If you are visiting Hong Kong for the first time, and have nowhere to turn for advice, this guide is probably better than nothing. You might end up spending more money, and eating much less well than you could, but at least you won't be completely lost. Which is the only reason I give this guide two stars rather than one.
これらのレビューは参考になりましたか？
ご意見はクチコミでお聞かせください。
クチコミ
クチコミは、商品やカテゴリー、トピックについて他のお客様と語り合う場です。お買いものに役立つ情報交換ができます。
|
この商品のクチコミ一覧
クチコミを検索
|
![[トピックを作成する]](http://g-ec2.images-amazon.com/images/G/09/x-locale/communities/discussion_boards/start-new-discussion-sec._V192261831_.gif){kind=small}
リストマニア
関連商品を探す
- 洋書 > Special Features > all foreign books
- 洋書 > Travel > Asia > China
- 洋書 > Travel > Guidebook Series > Michelin
- 洋書 > Travel > Reference & Tips > Food & Lodging
- 洋書 > Travel > Reference & Tips > Guidebooks
同じキーワードの商品を探す
フィードバック
- カタログ情報、または画像について報告
- 著者からのコメント
- 出版社からのコメント
|
