I was waiting for this book to be published before it even hit the printers. The reason is because I played a role in this, went to see Eizenstat specifically to point out what he left out, and politely confronted him over it.
One thing Eizenstat brings out is that the Jewish community of America seems to have problems getting along with the European Jewish community. There is also a question of style, in that American president Bronfman would show up with a huge entourage, whereas European Jews tend to be more subtle.
My role in this sordid tale, which got cut out of the book for reasons below, regards the looted books. Just check the index and you will not see "Offenbach Depot" or "Library of Congress." What happened during WWII was that the Nazis not only looted art but books as well. In an odd twist of fate, the Nazis wanted to found a center to study Jews and Judaism. With that in mind, they collected over a million books rather than destroy them. At the end of the war the Nazis had them stored at the Offenbach Depot along with a number of other items.
A committee was set up, which included men from the Library of Congress, in order to repatriate books to the countries they had been looted from. The Nazis had also identified individual Jews with their own private libraries (I believe of 10,000 books) and confiscated those as well as items from Jewish libraries and synagogues. Just as with the art, many of the Jew owners had been murdered, so they went back to the country of origin. But what to do about Germany and those considered "unclaimed?" It was decided these for the most part would go to newly-founded Israel as the moral inheritors.
Unfortunately, in my opinion (and for which I was quoted in The Washington Post), the Library of Congress brought over hundreds of thousands of books, keeping some for their own collection and distributing others to 250 institutions. This is where I come in. I was the Library employee who had brought over the Library archives from storage (35 boxes I think) for some research on Third Reich materials in the Rare Book Division. For this reason, I was called to speak with the historian on Clinton's presidential commission as well as, three days later, the historian for the Department of Justice working on the same issue.
I told both the same thing when they asked "Does the Library have any Holocaust loot?": Yes. Surprised, they asked me how I knew. Easy, the documents point to this. Furthermore, there are stamps on the books which so identify them. Indeed, "transfer" and Offenbach Depot identifiers are all over the books. The problem, as I told them, is twofold. First, with over 20 million books at the Library, the majority of the loot was in the general collection. Secondly, thousands were sent to other libraries. I provided each with copies of the documents proving this. Interestingly, a number of the institutions receiving the material were worried about the legality and morality of the books. Of all the institutions that received the books, though, only Canada properly identified each book as being Holocaust loot. This was in case a family member appeared and wanted to search for family property.
After finding this out, Eizenstat's assistant called me up and asked to meet me. I agreed, but told him only off-site. I was then told that the Librarian of Congress, James Billington, had told this man to get lost. I then came home to a message on my answering machine from Bronfman's assistant, Elan Steinberg, giving me his office and cell phone numbers. By the time I called him back in a couple of days, events had moved very rapidly, including a DOJ meeting where my name was mentioned quite a few times. A woman answered Steinberg's phone and told me he didn't want to talk to me. Fine.
The book issue was at first on the commission's website, which I copied before they decided to erase that part. So what happened when I met Eizenstat? At the book talk at the Library of Congress he was warmly greeted by the Librarian as "his friend of thirty years." Okay. At the book signing I identified myself as the "unidentified Library employee" in his initial report regarding the books. His pen stopped in mid-air before he could sign. "Was this resolved to your satisfaction?" I replied, "Absolutely not."
This book, therefore is quite hypocritical on the part of the author. I am sure he is a nice guy and means well. But this country builds statues to people who tell the truth simply for the fact that telling the truth is always quite difficult--otherwise everybody would always tell the truth. I paid a price for telling the truth, even though I have no agenda and am not Jewish or the son of some SS doctor. That's why I read with amusement his closing statement and quote on page 356, "It is not your obligation to finish the task, but neither are you free to exempt yourself from it."