Would you like to see this page in English? Click here.

この商品をお持ちですか? マーケットプレイスに出品する
The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs
 
その他のイメージを見る
 

The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs [ハードカバー]

Dougal Dixon


出品者からお求めいただけます。



キャンペーンおよび追加情報

  • 掲載画像とお届けする商品の表紙が異なる場合があります。ご了承ください。


商品の説明

内容説明

Here is the ultimate book for dinosaur lovers--a complete identification guide featuring 600 dinosaurs, written by a leading expert and stunningly illustrated.

登録情報


この商品にタグをつける

 (詳細)
タグは、商品との関連性が非常に強いキーワードまたはラベルのようなものです。
タグにより、すべてのお客様がお気に入りの商品の整理と確認を行うことができます。
※タグは初期設定で公開になっています。詳しくはこちら
 

カスタマーレビュー

Amazon.co.jp にはまだカスタマーレビューはありません
星5つ
星4つ
星3つ
星2つ
星1つ
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:  5個のレビュー
12 人中、11人の方が、「このレビューが参考になった」と投票しています。
Dixon slips on this one 2006/11/10
By John McWhorter - (Amazon.com)
形式:ハードカバー
As much as I admire Dougal Dixon's work, this book is disappointing in many ways although it gets an A for effort.

These days, with the computer-generated lifelike images of dinosaurs that are now familiar from the Dorling-Kindersley books and the WALKING WITH DINOSAURS shows and books, if a book is to rely instead on paintings, then they must reach a certain standard. John Sibbick's work for the David Norman and Peter Wellnhofer books would be an example.

Unfortunately, the artists in this book contribute rather wan, workmanlike pictures. This is especially problematic in a book treating so very many dinosaurs, since inevitably the job requires rendering several very similar related animals. The artists here tend towards rather ordinary side shots, and just rendering occasional genera in fanciful colors does not provide enough variety to avoid a certain monotony in terms of, for example, the stegosaurs or the prosauropods.

Too often, the artists have apparently not even been directed to render distinctive details of the creature in question. One mosasaur is described as having a large head -- but the picture has an ordinary head like all the others. A nodosaurid is described as having a long neck -- but the picture indicates no such thing, and so on.

The illustrations here would be fine in a book written in the early seventies (they recall typical dino illustrations in kids' dinosaur books of that time). But in an ambitious book like this they are disappointing.

There is also a problem with coverage. Dixon claims to cover "all" of the known genera, but that's an overstatement by a long shot. Rather, he covers most of them, while too often just mentioning others parenthetically, even ones just as well known in terms of material as the ones chosen to feature. Properly speaking, Dixon has selected a goodly number of the known genera, perhaps wanting to avoid a certain monotony in including every single one of groups of similar animals. But this still means that this is not, truly, a comprehensive survey in the way that the Glut encyclopedias, Gregory Paul's theropod book, or on-line lists are.

And it is unclear why in so many cases Dixon includes full illustrated entries on dinosaurs he readily acknowledges are known only from fragments, such as sometimes just a jaw or some leg bones, while again leaving out better known genera.

The text is okay, although each entry is divided into three parts, a kind of intro, a description getting down to specific structural features, and then an often extended caption to the picture. But often it is unclear what the real point is of subdividing the text into these three sections, any one of which could practically substitute for the other. It thus becomes distracting to deal with the choppy quality of the entries, which would better be written as a single piece of text.

Ultimately, the standard against which all dinosaur surveys should be measured is David Norman's from the eighties, which is now increasingly out of date but once gave the most solid, comprehensive coverage of the dinosaur subject possible for non-scientists, complete with John Sibbick's marvelous paintings. Short of a revision of that one, Dixon's book now stands as the closest equivalent, and it is clear that massive effort went into putting it together. (For the record, one nice aspect is the boxes on most page spreads addressing some interesting question such as what happened to the grand old genus TRACHODON.)

But as of now, I am still hoping somebody gives Norman and Sibbick a good deal to give us an encore.
6 人中、6人の方が、「このレビューが参考になった」と投票しています。
Great effort marred by some sloppy illustrations 2006/11/17
By Reed J. Richmond - (Amazon.com)
形式:ハードカバー
As another reviewer has pointed out, several illustrations are just not good (the Spinosaurs stuck out in particular for me). Most of the illustrations are excellent which makes you wonder why the poor ones are in there. Another problem is that certain dinosaurs get a full page treatment while some popular dinosaurs get the standard 1/4 page. The first part of the book has some excellent material and the dinosaur "tree" runs across several pages and is really fun to look at. But again, the full-page illustrations dividing the dinosaur eras look like they were drawn by a grade schooler. Still the book is great just for browsing through on a rainy day.
1 人中、1人の方が、「このレビューが参考になった」と投票しています。
All you want to know Guide 2006/11/7
By Mark K. Cleary - (Amazon.com)
形式:ハードカバー
This is an awesome book, highly recommended for any one who wants a guide to all known dinosaurs. The illustrations are very accurate to habitat and body structure. It goes beyond your basic dinosaurs. Great to use by itself or with other dinosaur guides. The information is also well put together with a lot of background about the names and species.

If you love Dinosaurs, you deffinately want this in your collection.

I use mine all the time for research for my art, very pleased with it.

クチコミ

クチコミは、商品やカテゴリー、トピックについて他のお客様と語り合う場です。お買いものに役立つ情報交換ができます。
この商品のクチコミ一覧
内容・タイトル 返答 最新の投稿
まだクチコミはありません

複数のお客様との意見交換を通じて、お買い物にお役立てください。
新しいクチコミを作成する
タイトル:
最初の投稿:
サインインが必要です
 

クチコミを検索
すべてのクチコミを検索
   


リストマニア

リストを作成

関連商品を探す


同じキーワードの商品を探す


フィードバック