The Female Eunuch (Harper Perennial Modern Classics) [ペーパーバック]

In the intervening years, so much has changed for women (because of feminism) that Greer's antics and ability to go head to head with macho rakes/serious artists (like she did with Norman Mailer in an infamous Town Hall meeting) is less notable. Still, Eunuch bristles with energy and youth and it makes me think, even though I was certainly not raised in the repressive forties and fifties.

I think that this book is definitely worth reading, especially to see how far we've come.

Her statements about clitoral orgasms being a "new scientific myth" makes very odious and irritating reading. Ms Greer tries to excuse herself by saying that focusing on clitoral arousal is just another limiting perspective on female sexuality. She is wrong. Clitoral arousal is still a mystery to many women. Who still expect to achieve vaginal orgasms and wonder why they do not. Which only proves that for all the scientific hoopla in the 1970s. Most women are still ignorant about how their genitalia function.

Ms Greer mentions hiding her soiled sanitary rag from her brother as a girl and is obviously indignant about it But still does not question why female reproductive organs are considered so objectionable that they and their issue should be hidden. I would have considered this oversight a direct result of her childhood in Australia which is basically a secular country. However Ms Greer attended a Roman Catholic girls school. Implying that she should know full well why women genitals and menstrual fluid are considered 'unclean' It is laid out quite clearly in Leviticus.

Ms Greer,s strength lies in her confrontational style and ability to elucidate how women are taught to be women by the cultural process of engendering them and rather than an evolutionary predisposition to domestic servitude.

At the time she made these statements there was little scientific data to support her assertions that far from women wanting to be frivolous domestic chattles and childbreeders. They actually were capable of pursuing any form of employment and having a womb in no way hampered this.

Ms Greer is ignorant of non western cultures and even pre christian cultures and so she assumes that woman have always been socially subordinate because she has a womb. This is unfortunate because the western image of womanhood is not a universal standard and is itself quite recent. She would have done well to read up on the European witchtrials in which millions of women especially midwives died. Because their professions were in direct competition with doctors and priests.

Ms Greer is at her best when she denounces. Female financial and emotional dependence on men as infantile and thus uninspiring for both men and woman. Contrary to many accusations of Ms Greer being a "man-hater" this book indicates that she is more likely to place women,s inferior social status squarely on the shoulders of women themselves.

Ms Greer exhibits a sneaky admiration for men and their "liberated" sexuality and obvious disdain for womens inability to relinquish dependency relationships built on emotional blackmail. Ms Greer beleives that women hold on to their men by forcing them into "addictions" which "only they the wife , lover will tolerate". Some people will find this analogy troubling and well they might. How many women hold onto thier men by getting into bondage ?

Ms Greer is troubled by the concept of love as it is filtered through the media and "trashy" romantic fiction. She believes that women are addicted to an illusion. She says this whilst ignoring the fact that people have been writing love letters to each other from the moment they invented writing. She should look at some of the ancient Egyptian love letters written 1,849 BC. Which prove that human beings have always been romantic and perhaps they always will be.

Ms Greer also expresses open disdain for that paragon of virtue Motherhood. The lofty pedestle of female worth that all women are supposed to want to climb. She notes how "over nurturing" also known as the "smothering mother" Can suppress her children,s identities especially female children by preventing them from exploring their external environment. Unlike their brothers who are encouraged to explore and investigate the world without fear. This Ms Greer concludes results in arrested development both academically and emotionally for girls. Because the child will cling to the mother. To parents who have been indoctrinated into beleiving that the mother,s perpetual presence is essential for an emotionally balanced and secure child this will sound outrageous and extreme.

Ms Greer is a head of her time by saying that women begin to falter educationally during adolescence and places this at the door of conflicts between parents that believe the socialization of a daughter involves suppressing her personality into compliant help-mate and schools which encourage girls to be ambitious and use their academic and athletic talents.

Most woman Ms Greer attests can not reconcile the need to be a "good daughter and wifely prospect" with their need for personal achievement. Ms Greer therefore concludes that they betray themselves and become fodder for the capitalist system. In which personal fulfillment is prosponed and subverted in to rabid consumer good consumption. What is also known as the "shopaholic" Ms Greer suggest in wiley humor that if women ceased to shop they could bargin for greater say in economic influence. Yes a shopping strike !

Ms Greer is instantly controversial when she states that the mother and daughter relationship is a problematic one. That the mother may see her role as one of suppression of her daughter s identity. This attitude may appear shocking to some who believe that a "girls best friend is her mom" Ms Greer was born in the 1930s and there is an obvious clash between her need to be freed from the conventional female expectations in life and her mother,s desire to straight-jacket her personality into feminine cliches. Ms Greer mentions how her grandmother and mother debated about whether she should wear a corset or not whilst women were still wearing girdles and other stomach shapers.

What makes this book a ground breaker is Ms Greer,s focus on sex and how women being de-sexed by society (she does not mention the role of religion in this madonna-whore dichotomy) Has created a society of women that are easily exploited both as teenagers when they simply give into sex with partners they don't know and later as spouses. Where sex is bartered for a roof over their heads

Ms Greer has been described a a faux feminists and a libertine. Her faux feminism attributed to her damning indictment of motherhood and the role that women play in their own suppression. Ms Greer expects opposition and in her book she courts it at every turn. Knowing that militant feminists will charge after her.

The other accusation against her of being a libertine is perhaps a more serious one. Because it is about gender betrayal. Ms Greer is often scathing about female sexuality which she considers subdugated into coyness. She is right about female sexuality being subdugated but rather than claiming that women want to be female eunuchs. She might be better served by looking at the religious restrictions on women being sexually liberated. In this instance Ms Angiers book is a step on by elucidating women's need for sex but the social curtailment of womens sexual exploration being the direct product of religious restraints enshrined in laws. If your being threatened with physical mutilations, rape, burning, stoning or social ostracism as a slut. It is likely that your libido might not be up to much !

Ms Greer book is still ground breaking and I recommend it on the basis of its criticism of how women are reared. Both men and woman should read it. Especially if they are parents with a daughter. Ms Greer though brash and angry still poses some very important questions about how training a girl into submission perpetuates womens lower status especially financially. She cites the nurses strikes in England where the nurses were compromised because their status as compassionate care givers prevented them from striking and securing a wage that they could live of. Other examples which are obviously more anecdotal references to Ms Greer's own youth include her accounts of how women are trained into a servile politeness. Which means that young women are forced to listen to "boring men" chatter on and on and never interject with their own comments.

This occurs because Ms Greer believes women are educated and nurtured into believing themselves intellectually and sexually inferior and incomplete.

I think for this reason alone her book is worth a second glance. Because it would be a lie to claim that these statements have become irrelevant with the passage of time. The process of womens liberation has still along way to go.