Would you like to see this page in English? Click here.


または
1-Clickで注文する場合は、サインインをしてください。
こちらからも買えますよ
この商品をお持ちですか? マーケットプレイスに出品する
Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion
 
 

Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion [ハードカバー]

Frank Prochaska

価格: ¥ 3,590 通常配送無料 詳細
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
通常1~3週間以内に発送します。 在庫状況について
この商品は、Amazon.co.jp が販売、発送します。 ギフトラッピングを利用できます。

キャンペーンおよび追加情報

  • 掲載画像とお届けする商品の表紙が異なる場合があります。ご了承ください。


商品の説明

内容説明

Eminent Victorians on American Democracy surveys a wide range of British opinion on the United States in the nineteenth century and highlights the views of John Stuart Mill, Walter Bagehot, Sir Henry Maine, and James Bryce, who wrote extensively on American government and society. America was significant to them not only because it was the world's most advanced democracy, but also because it was a political experiment that was seen to anticipate the future of Britain. The Victorians made a memorable contribution to the continuing debate over the character and origins of democracy through their perceptive examination of issues ranging from the US Constitution to its practical application, from the Supreme Court to the party system. Their trenchant commentary punctures several popular American assumptions, not least the idea of 'exceptionalism'. To Victorian commentators, the bonds of kinship, law, and language were of great significance; and while they did not see the United States as having a unique destiny, they rallied to an 'Anglo-American exceptionalism', which reflected their sense of a shared transatlantic history. What distinguishes the Victorian writers was their willingness to examine the US Constitution dispassionately at a time when Americans treated it as a sacred document. Although the United States has changed dramatically since they wrote, much of their commentary remains remarkably prescient, if only because the American government retains so much of its eighteenth-century character. Today, when rival American priesthoods see the Constitution in the light of their particular altars, it is worth revisiting what leading Victorians had to say about it. It may come as a shock to American readers.

著者について


Frank Prochaska was born and educated in America but has lived much of his life in England. His previous books include The Eagle and the Crown: Americans and the British Monarchy (2008); Christianity and Social Service in Modern Britain (2006); The Republic of Britain 1760-200 (2000); Royal Bounty: The Making of a Welfare monarchy (1995); The Voluntary Impulse (1988), and Women and Philanthropy in Nineteenth-Century England (1980). He taught British history at Yale for many years and is an Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Historical Research, London University.

登録情報

  • ハードカバー: 169ページ
  • 出版社: Oxford Univ Pr (Txt) (2012/2/20)
  • 言語 英語, 英語, 英語
  • ISBN-10: 0199640610
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199640614
  • 発売日: 2012/2/20
  • 商品の寸法: 21.8 x 14.2 x 2.4 cm
  •  カタログ情報、または画像について報告

  • 目次を見る

この本のなか見!検索より (詳細はこちら
この本のサンプルページを閲覧する
おもて表紙 | 著作権 | 目次 | 抜粋 | 索引
この本の中身を閲覧する:

この商品にタグをつける

 (詳細)
タグは、商品との関連性が非常に強いキーワードまたはラベルのようなものです。
タグにより、すべてのお客様がお気に入りの商品の整理と確認を行うことができます。
※タグは初期設定で公開になっています。詳しくはこちら
 

カスタマーレビュー

Amazon.co.jp にはまだカスタマーレビューはありません
星5つ
星4つ
星3つ
星2つ
星1つ
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:  1個のレビュー
1 人中、1人の方が、「このレビューが参考になった」と投票しています。
Critical Insights Pertinent for Today? 2012/4/24
By Ronald H. Clark - (Amazon.com)
Amazonが確認した購入
This 170-page book focuses upon a most interesting and quite timely issue: possible shortcomings in the American governing structure. What with President Obama having increasingly to rely upon such artifices as regulations, prosecutorial discretion, waivers, signing statements, executive orders, and recess appointments to deal with a recalcitrant Congress, it touches upon some very important issues to say the least. What is unique is that the book's center points of analysis are some eminent Victorian writers taking the measure of American government during the middle and late 19th century. Specifically, the four central characters are John Stuart Mill (1806-1873); Walter Bagehot (1826-1877); Sir Henry Sumner Maine (1822-1888); and James Bryce (1838-1922). It is hard to think of a more illustrious collection of Victorian public intellectuals.

The author opens with a fine introduction: "Transatlantic Attitudes" that lays out the principal themes the book discusses. Then individual chapters are devoted to each of the "big four". In a conclusion, "Anglo-American Exceptionalism," the author ties all these themes together. In fact, the conclusion is so effective, a reader might profit by reading it first. Generally speaking, while these Victorians were highly interested in American developments, since they assumed that whatever good had resulted came about due to our English roots, they were also a touchy and critical group as well. They disputed American exceptionalism seeing instead the Constitution as highly derivative of English experience; did not feel the Constitution was as close to perfection as could be; were concerned (probably due to the French Revolution more for themselves than us) about the increasing spread of democracy that was becoming evident evident in the American system; and were generally quite despairing of the quality of American political leaders and especially parties.

Mill while generally sympathetic to American government, did see some major faults. While he approved of judicial power, he was simply disappointed (as were all four to an extent) with America not having things simply run by a well-educated aristocracy, such as the House of Lords--this is why they all liked the Senate very much. Bagehot was probably the harshest critic of the four. His target was the Constitution itself, which he felt was inflexible, could not adapt rapidly enough, and was viewed with religious reverence by Americans. Too many barriers to strong and effective government blocked progress. For him, the written Constitution just rendered the government too stodgy. Maine, so incisive in his jurisprudential work, authored a major attack on democracy in "Popular Government." Unlike historian George Bancroft, he hardly saw God guiding the destiny of the American republic. Rather, the "great unwashed" were increasingly making a mess of things.

The strongest supporter of the American system was Bryce, author of the classic "American Commonwealth"(1888). Bryce was the only one of the four who had spent much time in the U.S.; in fact he was the UK's ambassador just before the first war and did much to unify the two countries. Bryce liked the Constitution and embraced spreading democracy and equality, though with some reservations. He feared plutocratic control rather than democratic. His approach was also broader, since he focused on national character as a factor. His famous book is still worth reading today.

All of these folks had numerous suggestions for improving the American system, and given the situation today, it is probably a good time to take a careful look at some of them. Especially, these four were concerned about the delay accruing when replacing a president, preferring the parliamentary system which made substitutions quickly. Their detailed critiques of the system surprisingly seem often still to be on target even today. For those such as myself interested in Victorian intellectual history, as well as students of the American governing process, this highly informative book well merits careful attention.

クチコミ

クチコミは、商品やカテゴリー、トピックについて他のお客様と語り合う場です。お買いものに役立つ情報交換ができます。
この商品のクチコミ一覧
内容・タイトル 返答 最新の投稿
まだクチコミはありません

複数のお客様との意見交換を通じて、お買い物にお役立てください。
新しいクチコミを作成する
タイトル:
最初の投稿:
サインインが必要です
 

クチコミを検索
すべてのクチコミを検索
   


リストマニア

リストを作成

関連商品を探す


同じキーワードの商品を探す


フィードバック


Amazon.co.jpのプライバシー ステートメント Amazon.co.jpの発送情報 Amazon.co.jpでの返品と交換