|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
よく一緒に購入されている商品
商品の説明
内容説明
Illus. in full color. Difficult dinosaur names are simplified with phonics.
Book Description
Illus. in full color. Difficult dinosaur names are simplified with phonics.
登録情報
|
この本のなか見！検索より
（詳細はこちら）
カスタマーレビュー
最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー
4 人中、4人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
形式:ペーパーバック
Step into ReadingシリーズのStep 3
語数 896 YL 1.2
タイトルのとおり、恐竜について書かれた本です。
今は恐竜が生きていないこと（昔生きていたこと）、
恐竜がいた当時の他の生物、恐竜の大きさ、草食
恐竜と肉食恐竜がいたこと、肉食恐竜からの身の
守り方、恐竜についてまだ解明されていないこと、
そして恐竜の絶滅まで、恐竜の基本的な情報が、
リアルな挿絵とともに、分かりやすくまとめられ
ています。
恐竜に初めて興味を持った子どもたち、恐竜のこと
を初めて知る英語圏の子どもたちにぴったりの内容と
英語で書かれています。
多読用としても、読み聞かせ用としても、恐竜が
好きならば特に楽しく読めると思います。
語数 896 YL 1.2
タイトルのとおり、恐竜について書かれた本です。
今は恐竜が生きていないこと（昔生きていたこと）、
恐竜がいた当時の他の生物、恐竜の大きさ、草食
恐竜と肉食恐竜がいたこと、肉食恐竜からの身の
守り方、恐竜についてまだ解明されていないこと、
そして恐竜の絶滅まで、恐竜の基本的な情報が、
リアルな挿絵とともに、分かりやすくまとめられ
ています。
恐竜に初めて興味を持った子どもたち、恐竜のこと
を初めて知る英語圏の子どもたちにぴったりの内容と
英語で書かれています。
多読用としても、読み聞かせ用としても、恐竜が
好きならば特に楽しく読めると思います。
形式:ペーパーバック|Amazonが確認した購入
インターナショナルプリスクールに通う4歳の息子の為に購入。恐竜に少し興味を持っていたのでこの本を選んだのですが、予想以上に気に入ってくれ、初めの数日間は毎日のように読まされました。今では息子ひとりで読んでいます。英語としては、わかりやすい表現が多く、step３のわりには簡単に思えます。（だから息子も読めるのですが。） 内容としては、恐竜に興味がない私が読んでも「なるほど、そうなんだ」と納得しながら楽しめる本です。
あまり期待してなかっただけに、買ってヨカッタ度が高い一冊です。
あまり期待してなかっただけに、買ってヨカッタ度が高い一冊です。
Amazon.com で最も参考になったカスタマーレビュー (beta)
Amazon.com:
7個のレビュー
7 人中、6人の方が、｢このレビューが参考になった｣と投票しています。
Major scientific errors! Terrible!
2003/5/1
形式:ペーパーバック
This is a classic book for young readers and I had thought it would be accurate on the level of the readers. I looked back at a copy with a publishing date of 1985 and I was shocked when I saw the apatasaurus called the old, incorrect name of "brontosaurus." But that was not the worst error! Many older books have the name wrong 9and thus the wrong head, but that can be a minor thing.
But it got worse when it showed the "brontosaurus" as having nostrils on top of its head, which is actually a feature of the Brachiasaurus. And then having it hid from the Allosaurus (correct predator, at least) under water perpetuates the swamp-dwelling, water-immersing behavior model which is again incorrect.
If only those offending pages could be excised it would get four or five stars. The book does show the flying and swimming contemporaries of the dinosaurs; correctly identifying them as not being "dinosaurs." That could be more explicit but the point is made, even if subtly.
But it got worse when it showed the "brontosaurus" as having nostrils on top of its head, which is actually a feature of the Brachiasaurus. And then having it hid from the Allosaurus (correct predator, at least) under water perpetuates the swamp-dwelling, water-immersing behavior model which is again incorrect.
If only those offending pages could be excised it would get four or five stars. The book does show the flying and swimming contemporaries of the dinosaurs; correctly identifying them as not being "dinosaurs." That could be more explicit but the point is made, even if subtly.
Now I see above there is a new publishing date. I hope the offending passage has been corrected. Then it would be a solid four-star book.
poorly written and horribly inaccurate - skip this dinosaur reader
2011/4/6
形式:ペーパーバック
this reader seemed like a no-brainer for my boys who love dinosaurs and are learning how to read. but i regret buying it and i write so that others don't make the same mistake i did. here is a run-down of the errors:
- the book uses the word "dinosaur" four times before telling how to pronounce it (and claims it's hard to say!)
- "there are no dinosaurs today." what about birds?
- as other reviewers have mentioned, it claims apatosaurus hid underwater.
- in addition to perpetuating the "brontosaurus" error, the book also refers to "anatosaurus" which is more properly known as edmontosaurus.
- it can be confusing to young readers to see "apatosaurus" and "anatosaurus," two similar names among only nine named in the book.
- the book depicts triceratops using its horns for (offensive) fighting, but the more accepted theories are either for defense or for courtship.
- the discussion of what killed the dinosaurs is horribly, horribly, wrong. only three ideas are offered, of which only one (the world got so much hotter that it became difficult to find food) is plausible. the book completely misses the K-T impact hypothesis by stating that maybe a comet "came too near the earth," a profoundly silly misunderstanding that evokes the equally ridiculous 1910 panic when the earth passed through halley's comet's tail. and advancing the idea that mice ate all of the dinosaurs' eggs just promotes scientific illiteracy.
granted, the book does get many things right: plesiosaurs and pteranodons were not dinosaurs, even huge dinosaurs had small eggs, dinosaurs co-existed with other reptiles like crocodiles, the world of the dinosaurs was very different from the world of today, and we don't know a lot about them.
but all told, this book is so full of falsehoods and errors, that you will spend half or more of your time trying to explain to your kids that the book is wrong.
- the book uses the word "dinosaur" four times before telling how to pronounce it (and claims it's hard to say!)
- "there are no dinosaurs today." what about birds?
- as other reviewers have mentioned, it claims apatosaurus hid underwater.
- in addition to perpetuating the "brontosaurus" error, the book also refers to "anatosaurus" which is more properly known as edmontosaurus.
- it can be confusing to young readers to see "apatosaurus" and "anatosaurus," two similar names among only nine named in the book.
- the book depicts triceratops using its horns for (offensive) fighting, but the more accepted theories are either for defense or for courtship.
- the discussion of what killed the dinosaurs is horribly, horribly, wrong. only three ideas are offered, of which only one (the world got so much hotter that it became difficult to find food) is plausible. the book completely misses the K-T impact hypothesis by stating that maybe a comet "came too near the earth," a profoundly silly misunderstanding that evokes the equally ridiculous 1910 panic when the earth passed through halley's comet's tail. and advancing the idea that mice ate all of the dinosaurs' eggs just promotes scientific illiteracy.
granted, the book does get many things right: plesiosaurs and pteranodons were not dinosaurs, even huge dinosaurs had small eggs, dinosaurs co-existed with other reptiles like crocodiles, the world of the dinosaurs was very different from the world of today, and we don't know a lot about them.
but all told, this book is so full of falsehoods and errors, that you will spend half or more of your time trying to explain to your kids that the book is wrong.
Great level 3 book
2009/9/29
形式:ペーパーバック
Is scientific accuracy the most important thing in exciting young readers? I think the reviews that get caught up in that are missing the big picture. Most early readers about dinosaurs are not written as a story with clever text and excellent illustration. This book is. It excites young kids to read and learn more about dinosaurs. It is not a scientific text, but a story. This excellent book got my son to move from a level 1-2 reader to a level 3, then quickly on to chapter books. He found this book exciting and could read it over and over. This is great for kids taking the next leap in reading. I highly recommend it!
これらのレビューは参考になりましたか？
ご意見はクチコミでお聞かせください。
リストマニア
|
|
関連商品を探す
- 洋書 > Children's Books > Animals
- 洋書 > Children's Books > Literature
- 洋書 > Children's Books > Science, Nature & How It Works
- 洋書 > Special Features > By Authors > Children's Books
- 洋書 > Special Features > By Authors > Literature & Fiction
- 洋書 > Special Features > all foreign books
- 洋書 > Teens > Literature & Fiction
同じキーワードの商品を探す
フィードバック
- カタログ情報、または画像について報告
- 著者からのコメント
- 出版社からのコメント
|
