There are many books with recommendations for living a more sustainable lifestyle. This one is very attractive, with its drawings and descriptions of Edo houses and technology. Farming and land management was wise and the use of simple, natural materials was aesthetically pleasing as well (as you would expect in Japan).
Early on, however, I had some problems with the glorification of the Edo period even though in a material way it could be called superior to ours. The author says that it fulfills the Hanover Principles for sustainable design (Hanover Expo, 2000) but he says that human rights and "open communication among stakeholders" are among those principles. He also tells us that population control in the form of infanticide was part of the Edo program for sustainability, as well as the prohibition of marriage for younger sons. (Of course they didn't have modern birth control.) There was a strict caste system in the land of Edo, with the Samurai half of the population using most of the land for their private homes. Frugality and humility were said to be important and necessary cultural values, but greed and arrogance must have been widespread too (as in most cultures). Is sustainability possible without some very serious sacrifices of human rights? (And I don't mean the right to buy or do everything you want.)
It would be interesting to see a comparison of the Edo culture with others of that period, such those of rural Europe. I expect there were many similarities.